geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2006 22:55:39 GMT
how does that make any sense?

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Then start the BPEL project under Geronimo. *NOT* under ServiceMix.
> 
> -- dims
> 
> On 2/3/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3 Feb 2006, at 15:08, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> James Strachan wrote:
>>>> Incidentally its worth looking at other projects at Apache like Agila
>>>> and various projects on http://ws.apache.org like EWS, Mirae, Muse,
>>>> WSRF, TSIK etc which are kinda quiet, some near dormant.
>>> No, it is not worth looking at them, if the intent is to use
>>> them as precedents of a process some are finding objectionable.
>>> Saying, 'They did it so why can't we?' is not appropriate.
>> I guess I didn't explain myself well there at all Ken sorry. (I'm
>> full of cold :( ).
>> I was just trying to say I'd rather see large, successful communities
>> form first, then if need be parts of the project are split off if
>> they become so wildly successful by themselves. So I was trying to
>> show some examples of projects which maybe could have benefited from
>> starting inside a larger, less granular project/community first
>> rather than starting small and dwindling then being merged back
>> together again due to inactivity.
>>
>> e.g. both Geronimo and Jakarta Commons have a broad range of
>> components inside them - many of which are reusable by themselves -
>> in both cases the courser grained projects helped grow a larger more
>> diverse community IMHO.
>>
>> James
>> -------
>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message