geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2006 15:53:27 GMT
Then start the BPEL project under Geronimo. *NOT* under ServiceMix.

-- dims

On 2/3/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2006, at 15:08, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > James Strachan wrote:
> >>
> >> Incidentally its worth looking at other projects at Apache like Agila
> >> and various projects on http://ws.apache.org like EWS, Mirae, Muse,
> >> WSRF, TSIK etc which are kinda quiet, some near dormant.
> >
> > No, it is not worth looking at them, if the intent is to use
> > them as precedents of a process some are finding objectionable.
> > Saying, 'They did it so why can't we?' is not appropriate.
>
> I guess I didn't explain myself well there at all Ken sorry. (I'm
> full of cold :( ).
> I was just trying to say I'd rather see large, successful communities
> form first, then if need be parts of the project are split off if
> they become so wildly successful by themselves. So I was trying to
> show some examples of projects which maybe could have benefited from
> starting inside a larger, less granular project/community first
> rather than starting small and dwindling then being merged back
> together again due to inactivity.
>
> e.g. both Geronimo and Jakarta Commons have a broad range of
> components inside them - many of which are reusable by themselves -
> in both cases the courser grained projects helped grow a larger more
> diverse community IMHO.
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/

Mime
View raw message