geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Dillon" <jason.dil...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Thoughts on splitting out "core" from, well, products & other stuff
Date Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:27:25 GMT
I think we need Maven2 first before can be effective at making the build more modular as described
here. 

--jason


-----Original Message-----
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:01:27 
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on splitting out "core" from, well, products & other stuff

I like the idea, but he devil is in the details.  Before we move  
forward, I'd like to look that devil in he eyes.

-dain

On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
> the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
> product/project?  So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
> core, system, etc. and a separate area for modules like Jetty, Tomcat,
> ActiveMQ, Directory, jUDDI, etc.  I guess mainly to draw the
> distinction between what's really part of the infrastructure and
> what's really "optional packages" that can be added on top (and I'm
> talking about "optional" in a non-J2EE-server sense where you start
> with literally nothing but the infrastructure and add only waht you
> want, or something like that).  So we'd still pull a lot of that in
> for our "J2EE" builds, but it would make a clearer distinction for
> anyone who wanted a more custom build.
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron

Mime
View raw message