Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97120 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2006 09:11:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2006 09:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 80711 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2006 09:11:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80661 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2006 09:11:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80644 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2006 09:11:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:11:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.205 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.205] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:11:14 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so851849wra for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:10:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=t9+Ohpnj6JkSaGzIsQXxUDTZs8/lbsWgKZbY9Nrqoq0X2YnmEZS5d8L86OLmdcPuHWxd7O9UZN0Nb118tzk5yifLtpiY6kgb8AuFTTjMDCfs4TEeVUV+ROdO37Us3Rv3kaIuBaRPyyatq061EME6rJzquPIJzk9Vk9gp6SY17Dk= Received: by 10.54.122.13 with SMTP id u13mr5571488wrc; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.2? ( [67.180.143.96]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d74sm2628168wra.2006.01.23.01.10.52; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:10:53 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <62C8E7B7-8EBA-4724-AFD5-8C6CE8F70EC7@yahoo.com> References: <74e15baa0601221809v385eb3c0mf9a0855ab1fa5243@mail.gmail.com> <62C8E7B7-8EBA-4724-AFD5-8C6CE8F70EC7@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: Geronimo Community Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:10:52 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Sender: Jason Dillon X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Speaking of which, ... I seem to recall a long time ago you > mentioning the idea of supplying a portlet app for each component > and plugging it into the admin console. I think J2 in geronimo > will now support deploying portlet apps more or less dynamically, > although I'm not yet happy with exactly how this is happening. > However, I'm not sure how to extend the portal itself based on > adding a portlet app, nor do I have any idea what else in the > portal needs changing when a component "registers". Are we at a > point where talking about this makes sense? It would be nice if applications could provide a set of portlets to admin the app itself too. Then ops folks would get a nice looking unified interface for admin of the system, as well as the applications running inside of it. --jason