Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To: <F6D71F01-C4E8-4220-A9CA-EE1AFD3A9039@gmail.com>
References: <F6D71F01-C4E8-4220-A9CA-EE1AFD3A9039@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <DD625123-53D7-4322-9BBA-1B1D68741727@iq80.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com>
Subject: Re: [Vote]: Re-version eclipse plugin from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:21:10 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

+1 to what ever Sachin wants to call it.

-dain

On Jan 13, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:

> Its been brought to my attention that to better align versions with  
> server releases, the eclipse-plugin should be re-versioned for its  
> initial release to be 1.0.0, not 0.5.0.  The idea here being that  
> any major releases of the server, will have a matching  
> corresponding eclipse feature version.  Minor versions may still  
> need to be independently versioned.  Having a plugin that packages  
> some of the Geronimo 1.0.0 runtime jars into a plugin that is  
> versioned 0.5.0 is confusing to many users.
>
> We have a small time frame to decide if we do want to change the  
> version immediately, as Eclipse-WTP is about to release their first  
> maintenance release 1.0.1, and we agree upon this, I will need to  
> inform them of this change so they can react ASAP.  Our next  
> opportunity to do this will may not be for another 1-2 months.
>
> [ ] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0
> [ ] Leave it at 0.5.0
> [ ] Doesn't matter
>
> - sachin
>
>