Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.200 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=HnFu7GnGtV7O10xejtY03Hbnlg8Vls56Xb3+WFPRF+CUkwMS4C2wrfAluKkBmGasFFw30Tn2WnNk3wf1DPj1nMDdj/Bl3OpOM7P0uIdYvPbFtFkhWsf/IbHtNXQNqfbi1mqpsxUS8pTP+nXk5u8+3+O6jsuZVuah9YkUvPFPcx8=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To: <43DDD8D0.2010708@coredevelopers.net>
References: <9C84CFA6-689D-4C35-A664-E86F54179F08@yahoo.com>
 <5E327A94-8DD9-4325-96F2-55C63BA4EE46@iq80.com>
 <43DA647B.9090803@coredevelopers.net>
 <A036714F-E48D-4B2C-8233-9BEAD8D8F699@gmail.com>
 <43DA6C67.5070502@coredevelopers.net>
 <21145976-D45F-479F-BA09-2602F510F6FF@gmail.com>
 <43DDD8D0.2010708@coredevelopers.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <B233C1E6-26FE-459E-8641-1D84789663F8@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: web clustering componentization
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:44:05 +0000
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

On 30 Jan 2006, at 09:13, Jules Gosnell wrote:
> James Strachan wrote:
>
>> On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>
>>> James Strachan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dain,
>>>>>
>>>>> David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively  
>>>>> extended   SessionFactories) should be plumbed into Geronimo  
>>>>> (i.e. GBeans),   not about the API's describing Sessions  
>>>>> themselves.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've looked at the stuff in modules/session - it looks very   
>>>>> similar  to some WADI internals - there is loads of overlap   
>>>>> here.  I have  some serious plans for converging WADI with   
>>>>> ActiveSpace and would  be happy to consider further changes to   
>>>>> reuse or contribute to your  sessions module. We should talk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll jot my ideas down and post them shortly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How about just implementing the Session APi directly using WADI? :)
>>>
>>>
>>> That's something that we could look at. I'd be interested to  
>>> hear  you plans for actually integrating the sessions with some  
>>> container  (web, ejb, etc...) as well - WADI is already doing this.
>>
>>
>> WADI is doing this for web only; the Session API is designed as a   
>> client API to use for OpenEJB, Lingo, ServiceMix, Tuscany et al.  
>> i.e.  the containers would use the API directly.
>>
> err - wrong :-)
>
> WADI already has various tier-independant abstractions and a  
> partial working OpenEJB integration )for SFSBs - Gianny Damour

Where does this live? Its news to me.


> ) and I am talking to Rajith Attapattu about Sessions for a number  
> of Web Service transports. So, I think we need to figure out how to  
> draw these two divergent threads together. I will look more closely  
> at your API and consider how WADI might implement them.
>
> Long-term, I intend for WADI to converge closely with ActiveSpace.  
> Are you intending to use this Session API with AS ? or do you have  
> other plans ?

I'm not really considering distributed caching or POJO abstractions  
to distributed programming in this thread; its a completely different  
problem.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/