Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ammulder@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.193 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=AqpvrkvP6nyji9WCmGTUIJVi8Z6/M2WZVdt0DRTaXyizedgKRRjJrLL62AJXDtxQk3RvnpZuAWIc2x0VtbAAxWGjSV5ETUjNr67qw5G/BmnYTncr3MpAEPqZkhWEM7EIpPLmWI8x2KYA4JcGEIfQXzjX7re4TgYvVK2JKmu+kD4=
Message-ID: <74e15baa0601041217t16657934g9564386ee07d92e9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:17:18 -0500
From: Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu>
Sender: ammulder@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?]
In-Reply-To: <60D28CBC-F848-4754-AC0B-ABF4E8DE1087@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <43BA8E80.3010108@hogstrom.org>
	 <60D28CBC-F848-4754-AC0B-ABF4E8DE1087@gmail.com>

+/-0 : The database pool creation portlet doesn't work for the
Embedded Derby driver in Tomcat.  It doesn't log an error either, just
bails midway through.  I'm not sure what's going on -- the same
procedure worked fine in Jetty, and a third-party database like
PostgreSQL doesn't have that same problem.  I wonder if our Jetty
config includes some Derby dependencies that the Tomcat config
doesn't?  I'll poke around a bit.  I guess no one's probably willing
to hold up the release on account of this...  :)

Aaron

On 1/3/06, Sachin Patel <sppatel2@gmail.com> wrote:
> forwarding this on behalf of Matt...
>
>
> - sachin
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org>
> Date: January 3, 2006 9:47:28 AM EST
> To: sppatel2@gmail.com
> Subject: [Fwd: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?]
>
>
> Can you forward thsi for me?  I'm still getting SPAM errors.  I've sent a
> note to Ken to see if he can help me decipher what's going on.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Vote] 1.0 Release - Do we ship it?
> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:21:30 -0500
> From: Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org>
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>
> All,
>
> We have had the last candidate out and available since 12/22.  I personal=
ly
> have
> had a chance to put the 12/22 build under performance stress and I'm
> satisfied
> that the build is stable and runs in a variety of modes using DayTrader.
>
> Despite the Christmas Holidays I have seen some traffic related to htis
> release
> on the list so some folks have been kicking it around as well.  At this t=
ime
> I'd
> like to call a vote to release 1.0.
>
> [ ] +1 Release 1.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release 1.0 (Reasons included)
>
> Looks like we got through the last remaining significant bugs and thansk =
to
> all
> who worked up to the end to get this release out there.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>