Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=3hqBJ4l98NVkm513hc+xKYnB+fTUMU6lmkYMrIAeXu8rPLnkD0kMkpH0o5UgJT8jrozdnv9ivGKVJ/+ntsnssY7vf/tYLRouJBxZWDT48FxnNtdv3oLJZwYjHn1GH7GkLK8LlQlKhCOA4CSV2iSCNSeq8Ui6LybVdNg49iruQeU=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
In-Reply-To: <43D8F092.4020700@apache.org>
References: <43D5623F.6090509@apache.org> <43D8F092.4020700@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <18693B5C-20D9-406E-A2C1-40B80450D65F@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: The web XSDs...need to clean them up
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:37:19 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> Ping!  Anybody out there?
>
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was going through the generic, tomcat and jetty web xsds and I  
>> saw a
>> number of issues I wanted to chat about and see if I can  
>> personally be
>> cleared up, or if I am seeing some anomolies.
>>
>> I notice a couple of differences that weren't making a lot of  
>> sense to me.
>>
>> First the geronimo-jetty-1.0 appears to still have the
>> container-configType in the XSD.  Am I correct in assuming that this
>> should only be in the generic?

yes
>>
>> Second, I noticed both the geronimo-jetty-1.0 and geronimo-tomcat-1.0
>> schemas have the inverseClassLoading attribute in them, but the  
>> generic
>> does not.  Is there a reason the generic does not?

my stupidity? forgetfulness?? :-)

I think a better question is whether we should turn  
inverseClassLoading into an empty element in the class loading info  
group.

I would support this, any other comments?

thanks for checking up on this.

david jencks

>>
>> Jeff