geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Strachan <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: web clustering componentization
Date Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:44:05 GMT
On 30 Jan 2006, at 09:13, Jules Gosnell wrote:
> James Strachan wrote:
>
>> On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>
>>> James Strachan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dain,
>>>>>
>>>>> David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively  
>>>>> extended   SessionFactories) should be plumbed into Geronimo  
>>>>> (i.e. GBeans),   not about the API's describing Sessions  
>>>>> themselves.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've looked at the stuff in modules/session - it looks very   
>>>>> similar  to some WADI internals - there is loads of overlap   
>>>>> here.  I have  some serious plans for converging WADI with   
>>>>> ActiveSpace and would  be happy to consider further changes to   
>>>>> reuse or contribute to your  sessions module. We should talk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll jot my ideas down and post them shortly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How about just implementing the Session APi directly using WADI? :)
>>>
>>>
>>> That's something that we could look at. I'd be interested to  
>>> hear  you plans for actually integrating the sessions with some  
>>> container  (web, ejb, etc...) as well - WADI is already doing this.
>>
>>
>> WADI is doing this for web only; the Session API is designed as a   
>> client API to use for OpenEJB, Lingo, ServiceMix, Tuscany et al.  
>> i.e.  the containers would use the API directly.
>>
> err - wrong :-)
>
> WADI already has various tier-independant abstractions and a  
> partial working OpenEJB integration )for SFSBs - Gianny Damour

Where does this live? Its news to me.


> ) and I am talking to Rajith Attapattu about Sessions for a number  
> of Web Service transports. So, I think we need to figure out how to  
> draw these two divergent threads together. I will look more closely  
> at your API and consider how WADI might implement them.
>
> Long-term, I intend for WADI to converge closely with ActiveSpace.  
> Are you intending to use this Session API with AS ? or do you have  
> other plans ?

I'm not really considering distributed caching or POJO abstractions  
to distributed programming in this thread; its a completely different  
problem.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


Mime
View raw message