geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Mulder <ammul...@alumni.princeton.edu>
Subject Re: v1.x Installer comments - Long
Date Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:46:04 GMT
I would prefer if we did not let a user install both web containers.  :)

I'd like to try out the installer soon.

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 1/27/06, Erik Daughtrey <erikd@schemacity.org> wrote:
>
> Ah, I knew that you'd asked for this, but I didn't realize that you had a
> strong conviction.  I suppose I should've asked ;)
>
> I'll leave it alone for now and focus on cleaning up a few things left.
>
> It would be great if a few others could try the installer and provide some
> feedback quickly.
>
> Feedback is welcome.  Thanks.
>
> regards,
>
> Erik
>
>
>  On Friday 27 January 2006 10:19, David Jencks wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 2006, at 5:54 AM, Erik Daughtrey wrote:
> > > Given the comments I've gotten, I'm going to change the installer
> > > and go back
> > > to the behavior where it does not allow the selection of both web
> > > container
> > > packs to install. I'm going to ditch the additional buttons which
> > > allow
> > > selected features to be inactive at runtime.
> > >
> > > We could put this up for a vote, but since there have been very few
> > > comments
> > > on this topic, I assume that most folks just want an installer that
> > > works
> > > well.
> >
> > I pretty much strongly prefer the way the installer works now, I
> > think I asked for it to be this way :-)
> >
> > I won't stand in anyones way though.
> >
> > My view is that the installer should present all the options
> > reasonably available.  They are MUCH easier to configure in the
> > installer than in any other way, and I think that the additional
> > confusion while using the installer is minimal.
> >
> > thanks
> > david jencks
> >
>

Mime
View raw message