geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Geronimo 2.0
Date Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:10:50 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/6/2006 7:07 AM:
> I'll summarize what I think I read.
> 
> HEAD will be 2.0 which includes JEE 5 and other significant work (Maven
> 2 conversion, etc.)
> 
> Branches/1.0 will be where the work for 1.0.x will take place.  It would
> be from this code base we'd branch to a 1.1 when appropriate.

So, we would eventually have 2 branches and 1 trunk:

branches/1.0
branches/1_trunk
tags/*
trunk

> I'm updating my local copy of the branches/1.0 with a version change for
> Geronimo to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT as well as updating to Tomcay 5.1.15 and
> Jetty 5.1.10 to incoroporate the latent fixes.
> 
> I'll build and test to make sure its still working (I'm not going to run
> TCK). and then commit these changes back when I've confirmed we're ready
> to go for 1.0.1.  Does this sound workable?

Can we have jira issues assigned to 1.0.1 so that we can see what's
coming down the pipeline?


Regards,
Alan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDvqSa1xC6qnMLUpYRArhpAJ91d5cSrHGEsY0pG6Jf+Nb+9gNuSgCfR8gH
m3qYJWEG9Zej/Sg+O5pMPQA=
=goh1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mime
View raw message