Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39270 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2005 02:24:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2005 02:24:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 73833 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2005 02:24:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 73761 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2005 02:24:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 73734 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2005 02:24:11 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:24:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.11.152.125] (HELO pointer.webappcabaret.net) (209.11.152.125) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:24:09 -0800 Received: (qmail 3025 invoked by uid 98); 8 Dec 2005 18:23:44 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.16.7.243?) (brianm@chariotsolutions.com@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2005 18:23:44 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <4398E78E.5040708@apache.org> References: <200512081308.06565.erikd@schemacity.org> <4398E252.7060108@gmail.com> <4398E78E.5040708@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Brian McCallister Subject: Re: [Vote] Installer: Default Web Container Selection Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:23:41 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 for Jetty -Brian On Dec 8, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > Ok then based on this... > > I hope that this group takes into the account of all votes, > including those that use the app server, our community and users. > If we cannot be neutral, then minimally we should let the users > decide what they want as a default container. If everyone wants > Jetty as a default, then I am behind it. But if a majority want > Tomcat, lets give the community what they want. > > A vote was put out...lets see what our users want. > > Jeff > > John Sisson wrote: >> I have changed my mind, please ignore my previous vote. >> My vote is now: >> [ X ] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection >> My initial concerns were with users not familiar with Jetty (e.g. >> Tomcat users) and the lack of Geronimo documentation on Jetty. I >> chatted to Greg W on IRC and he said he will improve the >> documentation. I have raised JIRAs GERONIMO-1314 and GERONIMO-1315. >> Thinking about it more, those who already use Tomcat in other >> projects are probably going to click Tomcat if they don't go to >> the trouble of looking into Jetty. >> I agree with Aaron that we should make it clear in the >> documentation that it is only a default to simplify the install >> process and either container can be used and both are supported. >> John >> Erik Daughtrey wrote: >>> The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default >>> selection. The operator can always override and select the >>> other. Vote: >>> >>> [ ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection >>> >>> We may run out of time before the votes can be tallied. For that >>> reason, I'm making the default Jetty unless someone can provide a >>> good reason why it shouldn't be. >>> >>> FYI - it's been decided that installation of both web containers >>> via the installer will not be allowed. Manual configuration of >>> both is possible though. >>>