Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60860 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2005 10:18:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2005 10:18:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 77053 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2005 10:18:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 76748 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2005 10:18:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 76736 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2005 10:18:25 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:18:25 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.193] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:18:24 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 18so1067717nzp for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:18:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=KUiTxu/MIN9q2ixTGmroz1viooAZK+2ytgc7N/caZOhxnXyKrTPMjviGGm0FVcSMvxv8GwkPybr/9jSDb+m963Qw5y/EGgs2Lxfo65Y7L2IjkbpVwldgc93rAc2JlNBRsbxMcMitC+2V2brzM/wtvw3EAyNRTTViAhrEeVNWfMg= Received: by 10.64.253.17 with SMTP id a17mr4654997qbi; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:18:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [82.45.246.79]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q16sm2538437qbq.2005.12.10.02.18.03; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:18:03 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <74e15baa0512081159t1d5bab42yfd035221a3c51374@mail.gmail.com> References: <200512081308.06565.erikd@schemacity.org> <439878E9.60209@gmail.com> <43987988.6060108@gmail.com> <74e15baa0512081159t1d5bab42yfd035221a3c51374@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: James Strachan Subject: Re: [Vote] Installer: Default Web Container Selection Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:17:59 +0000 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 for the same reason as Aaron On 8 Dec 2005, at 19:59, Aaron Mulder wrote: > +1 for Jetty -- we've gotten great support from the Jetty team > > Aaron > > On 12/8/05, Hernan Cunico wrote: >> Opps, click the wrong button. >> >> +1 for Jetty, it would be consistent with the previous default >> package. >> >> Cheers! >> Hernan >> >> Hernan Cunico wrote: >>> >>> >>> Erik Daughtrey wrote: >>> >>>> The installer should make either Tomcat or Jetty the default >>>> selection. The operator can always override and select the >>>> other. Vote: >>>> [ X] Make Jetty the default Web Container install selection >>>> >>>> [ ] Make Tomcat the default web container install selection >>>> >>>> We may run out of time before the votes can be tallied. For that >>>> reason, I'm making the default Jetty unless someone can provide >>>> a good >>>> reason why it shouldn't be. >>>> >>>> FYI - it's been decided that installation of both web containers >>>> via >>>> the installer will not be allowed. Manual configuration of both is >>>> possible though. >>> >>> >> James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/