Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ammulder@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.195 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=pnTDbEzoktnA8UH92hNWrP7FB9MhNnaxXCDyknQRuCJPJsWUVJUcR9il3y0AStLwmcGPMCCHDaV+SpkvkKJrW/q7JFuqHaspTm7vJTmZC4IYGkNNCz0IeUflLDE7yBqjEWWIER1frmj48IDnivQHsBIHTAnVqVLgRM/WKFOuPtM=
Message-ID: <74e15baa0512051040s7ff08133sa6feb6114d0302bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:40:34 -0500
From: Aaron Mulder <ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu>
Sender: ammulder@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing modules/assembly build - Please Respond
In-Reply-To: <fd73b2f89405ba1007cc40935dd53c67@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <fd73b2f89405ba1007cc40935dd53c67@yahoo.com>

I think all the missing items are critical for 1.0.  However, I really
need the online deployer to work in the new environment before we
remove modules/assembly.  I can wait on hot deploy, schemas, and
scripts.  (Though, I'm not sure why hot deploy would be a problem --
it's a fairly trivial module.)

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 12/5/05, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> My understanding is that we all agree that for 1.0 we will use the
> jetty/tomcat only builds from assemblies rather than the
> modules/assembly build that includes both.  I'd like to remove the
> modules/assembly build today.
>
> Here's what I  know is missing from the new assemblies/* builds:
>
> scripts
> schemas
> online deployer tool
> hot-deploy config
>
> Of these the most problematical is the online deployer tool.  Offline
> deployment won't work the same way with the new builds, and I'm working
> on a separate replacement.  However offline deployment is used in the
> modules/assembly build.
>
> I'd like to remove the modules/assembly build now and work on these
> missing pieces without having to maintain 2 build systems.
>
> Opinions?
>
>
> BTW I'm planning to do the scripts by building a jar containing them
> and unpacking in each assembly, and the schemas by (probably) enhancing
> the assembly plugin.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>