Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94661 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2005 21:32:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2005 21:32:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 46078 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2005 21:32:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46027 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2005 21:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46016 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2005 21:32:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:32:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.86.89.65] (HELO elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:32:08 -0800 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=GS9f8x/zfkFtsQ+LlTXNAqVy4s6PIXSvf+bAVja9ETxQafY0zLDfb0f5CoMvIBjL; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [24.225.66.101] (helo=[192.168.0.102]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Enjed-0003W3-2M for dev@geronimo.apache.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:31:47 -0500 Message-ID: <43A483BE.10007@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:31:42 -0500 From: Joe Bohn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [WEBCONSOLE] Start Playing with Pluto 1.1? References: <4398F2C5.10301@apache.org> <74e15baa0512081916r69c2ee66g69e4e88e9fbc968a@mail.gmail.com> <43A186C3.5050204@earthlink.net> <0135D574-FE48-4170-85BA-0CEDCED4ECD3@iq80.com> In-Reply-To: <0135D574-FE48-4170-85BA-0CEDCED4ECD3@iq80.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: c408501814fc19611aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79e66830a566d256c3020e2e6f24c6d321350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.225.66.101 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dain Sundstrom wrote: > One other question, does Pluto work well when other portal systems are > installed into the server? I could see us using Pluto for our console, > and J2 for the user land portal. > > -dain I think this is possible, but I wonder if it is worth the resource consumption and complexity to have multiple portal servers in the same Geronimo server. In addition to the resource consumption, keeping the web console portal independent of the user portal limits the ability for a user to integrate portlets from their business applications and Geronimo admin. A system administrator might want to manage their payroll system and their web applications from single user interface. I think it would be fine to offer lexibility in the portal server that a user chooses to include in G. However, if the user has chosen to use J2 then I think it makes sense for the web console to use this as well rather than including another Portal server (Pluto) in the image. just my 2 cents -- Joe Bohn joe.bohn@earthlink.net "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose." -- Jim Elliot