Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40292 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2005 16:00:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2005 16:00:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 10347 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2005 16:00:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10298 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2005 16:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10287 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2005 16:00:18 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:00:18 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.196] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:00:17 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so24892uge for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:59:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=QRGJVPx8x8f6h3hnvxa5FT7g4xTtgKECHX1SqZkQY+TqiM0Idr0DGU1kOmKN8VT8xfxRRTRuIJ+imZ9Bmf+XRE0i5KG0JG6qw1uuI172DzOG/4CN7pznAaZTEpPE8eq3abROC9FPgGoifTT915VKBU2jWb9rktgrAan7A1WJlpI= Received: by 10.67.24.13 with SMTP id b13mr264799ugj; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?82.210.176.51? ( [82.210.176.51]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id a1sm105060ugf.2005.12.08.07.59.54; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:59:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43985874.6010604@apache.org> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:59:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Java Adventure Builder Reference 1.0.3 webapp deployed References: <2969D7985E3EDB45BBC5386669CBC1ACB85CB1@ctsinchnsxua.cts.com> <4396970A.4000503@apache.org> <4398233D.1090304@trifork.com> In-Reply-To: <4398233D.1090304@trifork.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jacek Laskowski X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jakob F�rch (Trifork) wrote: > Hi Jacek Hi Jakob, > The status for my endeavour on the adventure builder: > I have (only locally) plans that enable all the ear files to deploy. Awesome! You're making an excellent progress with it! > [*Q1] > Would you like me to send you the plans I have developed - I guess the > repository would be better off with these than with the ones currently > there. Send them to the list or better yet attach to the JIRA issue - http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1164. Both will work fine. > I have had to replace a few parentId's from e.g. > org/apache/geronimo/SystemDatabase to > geronimo/system-database/1.0-SNAPSHOT/car. Yes, the changes are already in the repo ;) > It seems to be the case that for the 1.0-SNAPSHOT builds I am able to > produce, all "internal" configurations follow the "car" naming style > rather than the "org/apache/geronimo"-naming style. The 1.0-M5 build I > downloaded follow the "org/apache/geronimo"-naming style. > I guess we will have to get the application running on a build > resembling M5. Nope. The work is being done on the recent development builds. Of course you might work on the past releases, but since the application is still in the sandbox I wouldn't bother to support too much versions and keep it up-to-date. It makes it easier to promote the sample apps to the main build rather than keep it in the sandbox. > [*Q2] > Is there an easy way to make the maven script in > sandbox/adventurebuilder use the M5-build. I tried changing > geronimo_version in src/etc/project.properties to 1.0-M5, but that > doesn't seem to do the trick. I haven't tried it and don't think I will. Sorry. Why do you stick with the M5 version? If you don't want to build Geronimo from the sources, please check out sandbox only (and etc) and work with it. Maven will download the necessary components. > The server starts and afterwards and a superficial poke around the > consumer web site seems to have it working all right. > All the configurations corresponding to ear's in the application are in > state running. No comments ;) > Nevertheless, when starting the server, none of the web service endpoint > beans are able to start. As an example, for the CreditCardEndpointBean > the following appears in the log: > 13:06:11,032 DEBUG [GBeanSingleReference] Waiting to start > geronimo.server:name=CreditCardEndpointBean,J2EEServer=geronimo,J2EEApplication=org/apache/geronimo/Bank1.0.3,j2eeType=WSLink,J2EEModule=null > because no targets are running for reference WebServiceContainer > matching the patterns > geronimo.server:J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=org/apache/geronimo/Jetty,J2EEServer=geronimo,j2eeType=GBean,name=JettyWebContainer > and then at the end of the startup: > 13:06:26,725 WARN [SilentStartupMonitor] Unable to start > geronimo.server:name=CreditCardEndpointBean,J2EEServer=geronimo,J2EEApplication=org/apache/geronimo/Bank1.0.3,j2eeType=WSLink,J2EEModule=null > (starting) > > I guess this means that the bean didn't start ;-) It doesn't answer on > the address (http://localhost:8080/webservice/CreditCardService) > specified in the deployment descriptor. > > [*Q3] > Have you got any ideas on how to make the beans start? > I notice the J2EEModule=org/apache/geronimo/Jetty in the reference > matching string in the first log entry. The jetty configuration reported > by deployer.jar's list-modules is named geronimo/jetty/1.0-SNAPSHOT/car. > Could this be related to Q2 on how to get to run on a server with > "org/apache/geronimo"-naming style for configurations? I couldn't work on it yesterday, but will certainly tonight. I hope others on IRC will help me to understand and fix it once and for all. Keep the good work going! I'm really impressed with your progress. > Jakob Jacek