Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80496 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2005 02:24:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2005 02:24:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 81785 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2005 02:23:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 81732 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2005 02:23:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 81721 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2005 02:23:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:23:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [72.10.34.3] (HELO ss53.shared.server-system.net) (72.10.34.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:23:57 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([205.147.11.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by ss53.shared.server-system.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB72NZQk030256 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:23:37 -0800 Message-ID: <439647C3.9080704@toolazydogs.com> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:24:03 -0800 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Corba spec / IDL issues References: <4395BA8B.3000803@trifork.com> <4395C2C7.9080802@toolazydogs.com> <4395E8C9.4050300@t-online.de> <43961A42.6060802@trifork.com> In-Reply-To: <43961A42.6060802@trifork.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote, On 12/6/2005 3:09 PM: > Lars K�hne wrote: > >> This question hasn't been addressed yet. I really don't see the point >> of maintaining our own copy either. Where did that copy originate - >> isn't it based on the OMG files anyway? > > > I think the current files originate from the ORB in Trifork P4. > Originally, OMG did not distribute the idl files for the spec (as far > as i know). They used idl in the specification document, but no raw > idl files. > >> The OpenORB compiler supports local interfaces, and it is used to >> compile the OMG idl files in the OpenORB build, so that part could >> probably work. However the JacORB compiler is much more stable than >> the OpenORB compiler which has a *huge* amount of bugs, and one of >> those might become relevant for the test IDLs. > > > I did a bit of experimentation with the OpenORB compiler, and it is > also my impression that the JacORB compiler is more mature. I also > don't think the OpenORB compiler would be able to compile the OMG idl > files without modifying these significantly, or at least more than we > would have to with the JacORB compiler. With the JacORB compiler I was > able to compile the orb.idl and PortableServer.idl from OMG with only > one minor addition. Ok, let's follow Dain's advice and run with the JacORB compiler. Regards, Alan