Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60063 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2005 18:01:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2005 18:01:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 35685 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2005 18:01:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 35618 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2005 18:01:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 35607 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2005 18:01:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:01:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [72.10.34.3] (HELO ss53.shared.server-system.net) (72.10.34.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:01:40 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-4-205-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.205.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by ss53.shared.server-system.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB5I1IQQ003611 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:01:19 -0800 Message-ID: <4394808A.5080106@toolazydogs.com> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:01:46 -0800 From: "Alan D. Cabrera" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: How are we releasing our specs? References: <5acbce726a72a918f22c3eef5614bc0c@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <5acbce726a72a918f22c3eef5614bc0c@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Jencks wrote, On 12/5/2005 12:35 AM: > IIUC our spec jars are now built by maven 2. > > Are they getting put into any m1 repo we might be using to build from? Nope. I'll try to get this set up. > Are they under org.apache.geronimo.specs as groupId rather than > geronimo-spec? Yes, org.apache.geronimo.specs. > Who is managing releasing the 1.0 versions? Do we have to do anything > special? Do we want to release them now or at least build 1.0 > versions to test against, maybe putting them on a private repo somewhere? I think that they should have their own version number since they will not change too much. I think that we should jump ahead of the geronimo (trunk) release and release 1.0 of the specs right away. Regards, Alan