Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.203 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from;
        b=jtVQBc53BJQJu3lJ2IVi+Ic8ivYLz7/fhMVUJBsJXsunhuRcTeUct45gYedColYdBBrEy8DBPoy1IPGcwWx4ZTUdxfY0Em8rYBzqDKlSSbFHat4J/d5/dJW9Mwhtjmc3l4GkT3xjki8RyoN3jkZmNkGW9CszHzzzVtAAGApc6sw=
Message-ID: <438F1E85.4080700@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:02:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo console
References: <438F17F7.4020705@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <438F17F7.4020705@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jacek Laskowski <eljotpl@gmail.com>

Hernan Cunico wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm working now on documenting the administration tools and the console. 
> What is the final/official name for the console. I see it is referred as 
> *Geronimo Console*, *Server Console* and *Administration Console*.
> 
> I think the shorter the name the better, less complicated. ;-)

Hi,

Well, I think that the name may be as simple as Apache Geronimo Console 
;) However, it misses the point that it's an administration console, 
which would give us the other choice: Administration Console. Depending 
on the context the name is going to be used, both will work fine.

I hope you won't start a long-lasting discussion about the proper and 
*final* name ;)

> Hernan

Jacek