Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21936 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2005 17:55:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Dec 2005 17:55:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18043 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2005 17:55:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 17989 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2005 17:55:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 17978 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2005 17:55:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:55:07 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3141BB for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:54:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1185646827.1134669286498.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:54:46 +0100 (CET) From: "David Jencks (JIRA)" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-1365) JSR-88 Manfest has incorrect Class-Path entries In-Reply-To: <1303197750.1134598366880.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1365?page=comments#action_12360518 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1365: ---------------------------------------- My intention in setting the manifest classpath entries as I did was that when used directly as the jsr-88 implementation jar, the jar would be placed in the bin directory, possibly with a simpler name. In this case, the manifest classpath entries would be correct. I don't think that asking people to find a jar in the geronimo repository in order to use jsr-88 is appropriate. I think this issue illustrates that we are using manifest classpath too much and that it is not appropriate for large scale software. Unfortuneately I don't have a solution in mind. > JSR-88 Manfest has incorrect Class-Path entries > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-1365 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1365 > Project: Geronimo > Type: Bug > Components: deployment > Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Aaron Mulder > Assignee: David Jencks > Fix For: 1.1 > > We used to use bin/deployer.jar as our JSR-88 implementation JAR. As a result, all the Class-Path entries had the form "../lib/foo.jar" (resolving to geronimo/lib/...). > At some point, that was switched so that repository/geronimo/jars/geronimo-deploy-jsr88-1.0.jar became the official JSR-88 implementation JAR. However, all the Class-Path entries are still "../lib" even though that resolves to "repository/geronimo/lib/..." which is not valid. > Either we need to switch JSR-88 back to bin/deployer.jar or else we need to update the Class-Path entries to be relative within the repository. > Assigning this to David J since he mentioned updating the JSR-88 implementation JAR, so I suspect he has an opinion on which way to go with this issue. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira