geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache mini Geronimo (mini-G)
Date Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:08:34 GMT
We couldn't call that J2EE then...

On Dec 19, 2005, at 8:41 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> In truth, I think we can go further in allowing for a "mini-Geronimo".
>  For example, right now IIRC the core J2EE configuration contains
> OpenEJB, and we could probably break out OpenEJB into a separate
> configuration to let you easily configure a server without it.  I
> think I've been convinced that more/smaller configurations is the way
> to go, though we haven't figured out for sure how granular they should
> get.
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>
> On 12/19/05, Jan Bartel <janb@mortbay.com> wrote:
>> Faisal,
>>
>> You can use either standalone Tomcat or Jetty containers to give
>> you web container plus a couple of j2ee frills like jndi, resource
>> mapping etc etc.
>>
>> However, if you want to keep within the geronimo idiom, then Erik's
>> answer re cut-down installation is the way to go.
>>
>> regards
>> Jan
>>
>> Wade Chandler wrote:
>>> --- Faisal Akeel <faisal.akeel- 
>>> Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you look at the top reason that FireFox more
>>>> preferred over Mozilla
>>>> suite, this is because its small size and limited
>>>> focus feature.
>>>> So, Is there way to customize Geronimo to a simple
>>>> web container (jetty) and
>>>> small foot print database (derby) only, instead of
>>>> big J2EE application and
>>>> if it possible can anyone provide guide or a demo
>>>> example on the wiki web
>>>> site.
>>>> Some people like mini cooper over big SUV car.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That's what Tomcat is for.
>>>
>>> Wade
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message