geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Editable files other than .bat and .sh files and CRs LFs
Date Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:54:39 GMT
+1 to using CR/LF in zip files and LF in tar.gz files

-dain

On Dec 1, 2005, at 2:01 PM, John Sisson wrote:

> Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> Rather than using the archive format to determine the linebreak  
>> convention, I would prefer an explicit build option (build for CR  
>> or build for CR/LF). Also, having Windows specific archive(s)  
>> might imply that there is more OS-specific behavior than we really  
>> have...
>>
>> All of our previous Milestone distributions have used CR's only,  
>> has this posed a problem to Windows users? It hasn't really been a  
>> problem for me developing on a Windows platform... I wonder if  
>> Geronimo users would be happy with CR-only distributions until  
>> we're ready to offer truly integrated Windows-specific behavior...
>
> I think you mean LF instead of CR in your last paragraph.  I assume  
> that all the previous distributions used LF's because they were  
> built on non-Windows platforms.  If I build Geronimo on Windows  
> today the *.xml, *.txt, etc. files in the distribution  files will  
> contain CR/LF's.  When that distribution is used on a non-Windows  
> platform the CR's cause the problem demonstrated in my vi example  
> in the original mail.
>
> In summary, the contents of the distribution files are not the same  
> between builds on Windows and non-Windows platforms, which is bad.   
> It should not matter what platform a release is built on.
>
> Since this is a 1.0 release, now is the opportunity to do better  
> than some other projects and provide the files with the correct  
> linebreak convention for *NIX and Windows platforms to ensure a  
> positive user experience (e.g. Windows users don't get prompted to  
> convert to DOS format with some editors when they edit files).
> I don't think we want to be providing two forms of zip and tar.gz  
> files one with CR and the other with CR/LF.  *NIX users should  
> always use the tar.gz files so they get permissions set on files,  
> therefore it seems reasonable to assume that the zip distribution  
> will only be used by Windows users.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> John
>
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On 12/1/05, *John Sisson* <jrsisson@gmail.com  
>> <mailto:jrsisson@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Currently if you build a Geronimo distribution on Windows, and  
>> install
>>     on a *NIX platform, files such XML and property files will  
>> contain
>>     carriage returns.
>>
>>     This is ugly if you are attempting to edit an XML plan using
>>     something
>>     like the vi editor that displays the carriage returns as ^M.
>>
>>     This also is a problem for the viewable files in the root  
>> directory of
>>     the install, such as the README.txt file.
>>
>>     We could fix this by using the fixcrlf task (in the same place I
>>     did for
>>     GERONIMO-1232) and making the assumption that the zip  
>> distribution
>>     will
>>     only be used on Windows and the tar.gz distributions only used  
>> on *NIX
>>     platforms. This would allow people to use native editors on their
>>     platform (e.g. vi or notepad on windows) without having any  
>> problems.
>>
>>     Is this a reasonable assumption to make?  Of course we could
>>     explicitly
>>     state on the download page what the difference between the
>>     distributions
>>     would be.
>>
>>     John
>>
>>     Here is an example of me trying to edit an XML file using vi on
>>     Solaris
>>     (when built from Windows):
>>
>>     <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>^M
>>     <!--^M
>>     ^M
>>         Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation^M
>>     ^M
>>         Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the  
>> "License");^M
>>         you may not use this file except in compliance with the
>>     License.^M
>>         You may obtain a copy of the License at^M
>>     ^M
>>            http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0^M
>>     <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0%5EM>
>>     ^M
>>         Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
>>     software^M
>>         distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
>>     BASIS,^M
>>         WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either  
>> express or
>>     implied.^M
>>         See the License for the specific language governing
>>     permissions and^M
>>         limitations under the License.^M
>>     -->^M
>>     ^M
>>     <!-- $Rev: 292333 $ $Date: 2005-09-29 08:09:15 +1000 (Thu, 29 Sep
>>     2005)
>>     $ -->^M
>>     ^M
>>     <!--^M
>>     A security realm available to be used by sample applications.^M
>>     ^M
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message