geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Date Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:56:56 GMT
So are we ready to spin up another set of binaries now?

-dain

On Dec 17, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> Its fixed...I set a defaultHost GBean reference in the engine.
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>
>>> The Engine is starting before the host.
>>>
>>> After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be...
>>>
>>> The plan is looking for a collection of hosts.  But this does not  
>>> seem
>>> to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a
>>> single GBean reference.  Therefore its random of who gets started
>>> first...call it luck of the draw?  Therefore, this can rear its  
>>> head in
>>> HEAD (no pun intended).
>>>
>>> The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of
>>> hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started.
>>>
>>> I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a  
>>> direct
>>> GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my
>>> misunderstanding.  Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have
>>> collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat?
>>>
>>> IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is
>>> dangerous and very bad.
>>>
>>> I'll work on a solution of some form...
>>
>> The only possibility I've thought of so far is a linked list starting
>> with the Engine with a reference to the first or last Host, and each
>> Host with a reference to another.  I use something like this to order
>> the servlet startup in jetty.
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still  
>>>> occurs in
>>>> 1.0 but not in head?  I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both  
>>>> 1.0 and
>>>> head?  I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made  
>>>> from
>>>> the 1.0 branch and not head?  Is this incorrect?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Dave-
>>>>
>>>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>>> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes...let me follow up...
>>>>>
>>>>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I  
>>>>> should have
>>>>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in  
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377.  So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses  
>>>>>> the 1377
>>>>>> problem.  Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some  
>>>>>> other fix in
>>>>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this?  Last  
>>>>>> time I
>>>>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host"
>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a
>>>>>> showstopper..
>>>>>>  Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no  
>>>>>> functional
>>>>>> problem is totally accurate.  However, I suspect the presence  
>>>>>> of this
>>>>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and  
>>>>>> many
>>>>>> questions among new v1 users.  It may give the wrong initial
>>>>>> perception
>>>>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>>>>> somehow be moved to v1..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In Process
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP  
>>>>>>> redirects in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> geronimo.apache.org site
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce 

>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>> trace
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default 

>>>>>>> host.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Completed
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files
-
>>>>>>> applied by Matt
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed 

>>>>>>> per Dain
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly -  
>>>>>>> Applied by
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and  
>>>>>>> respin a
>>>>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know  
>>>>>>> they will
>>>>>>> not be.  The major ones are behind us.  It sounds like we're
 
>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the 

>>>>>>> fix from
>>>>>>> Dain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues?  Please assign them to
>>>>>>> yourself or
>>>>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows
 
>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> others are doing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great work folks.  I think we're almost there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning  
>>>>>>> (EST) and
>>>>>>> will get back on in the afternoon.  If someone needs me for some
>>>>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>


Mime
View raw message