geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Date Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:04:46 GMT
565-81F6-4DB1-AFD9-A7F74086DA04@iq80.com>
In-Reply-To: <69372565-81F6-4DB1-AFD9-A7F74086DA04@iq80.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
X-MMS-Smtp-Auth: Authenticated As matt@hogstrom.org
X-MMS-Smtp-Mailer-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1

Yup...just sent out a note in a new thread.

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> So are we ready to spin up another set of binaries now?
> 
> -dain
> 
> On Dec 17, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> 
>> Its fixed...I set a defaultHost GBean reference in the engine.
>>
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Engine is starting before the host.
>>>>
>>>> After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be...
>>>>
>>>> The plan is looking for a collection of hosts.  But this does not  seem
>>>> to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a
>>>> single GBean reference.  Therefore its random of who gets started
>>>> first...call it luck of the draw?  Therefore, this can rear its  
>>>> head in
>>>> HEAD (no pun intended).
>>>>
>>>> The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of
>>>> hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started.
>>>>
>>>> I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a  
>>>> direct
>>>> GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my
>>>> misunderstanding.  Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have
>>>> collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat?
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is
>>>> dangerous and very bad.
>>>>
>>>> I'll work on a solution of some form...
>>>
>>>
>>> The only possibility I've thought of so far is a linked list starting
>>> with the Engine with a reference to the first or last Host, and each
>>> Host with a reference to another.  I use something like this to order
>>> the servlet startup in jetty.
>>>
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>>
>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still  
>>>>> occurs in
>>>>> 1.0 but not in head?  I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both  
>>>>> 1.0 and
>>>>> head?  I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made  from
>>>>> the 1.0 branch and not head?  Is this incorrect?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff Genender wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was too darn quick with my send button...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes...let me follow up...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I  should

>>>>>> have
>>>>>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in  
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377.  So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses
 the 
>>>>>>> 1377
>>>>>>> problem.  Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some  other

>>>>>>> fix in
>>>>>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this?  Last
 time I
>>>>>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host"
>>>>>>> error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a
>>>>>>> showstopper..
>>>>>>>  Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no 

>>>>>>> functional
>>>>>>> problem is totally accurate.  However, I suspect the presence
 of 
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and
 many
>>>>>>> questions among new v1 users.  It may give the wrong initial
>>>>>>> perception
>>>>>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and
will
>>>>>>> somehow be moved to v1..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown
..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In Process
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP  redirects
in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> geronimo.apache.org site
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce
 stack
>>>>>>>> trace
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default
 host.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Completed
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files
-
>>>>>>>> applied by Matt
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed
 per 
>>>>>>>> Dain
>>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - 
Applied by
>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and
 respin a
>>>>>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know
 they 
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> not be.  The major ones are behind us.  It sounds like we're
 
>>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the
 fix 
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> Dain.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues?  Please assign them to
>>>>>>>> yourself or
>>>>>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows
 what
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> others are doing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great work folks.  I think we're almost there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning
 
>>>>>>>> (EST) and
>>>>>>>> will get back on in the afternoon.  If someone needs me for
some
>>>>>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message