geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Colasurdo <davec...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: Release 1.0 Status - Saturday the 17th
Date Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:49:23 GMT
Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still occurs in 
1.0 but not in head?  I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both 1.0 
and head?  I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made 
from the 1.0 branch and not head?  Is this incorrect?

Thanks
-Dave-

Jeff Genender wrote:
> I was too darn quick with my send button...
> 
> Yes...let me follow up...
> 
> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should have
> made that more clear in all of my previous emails.
> 
> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> 
>>I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch..
>>
>>I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in GERONIMO-1372!!!!!!
>>
>>However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in
>>GERONIMO-1377.  So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the 1377
>>problem.  Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other fix in
>>head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this?  Last time I
>>built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host" error.
>>
>>Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a showstopper..
>>  Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no functional
>>problem is totally accurate.  However, I suspect the presence of this
>>message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many
>>questions among new v1 users.  It may give the wrong initial perception
>>that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly.
>>
>>Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will
>>somehow be moved to v1..
>>
>>On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown ..
>>
>>http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html
>>
>>Is this covered under any other JIRA?
>>
>>BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last?
>>
>>Thanks
>>-Dave-
>>
>>
>>Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>>Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status:
>>>
>>>In Process
>>>GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in the
>>>geronimo.apache.org site
>>>GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues
>>>GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack trace
>>>GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host.
>>>
>>>Completed
>>>GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files -
>>>applied by Matt
>>>GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per Dain
>>>GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by Matt
>>>
>>>I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a
>>>build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they will
>>>not be.  The major ones are behind us.  It sounds like we're going to
>>>have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix from
>>>Dain.
>>>
>>>Any volunteers on the other issues?  Please assign them to yourself or
>>>send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what the
>>>others are doing.
>>>
>>>Great work folks.  I think we're almost there.
>>>
>>>I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning (EST) and
>>>will get back on in the afternoon.  If someone needs me for some
>>>reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564.
>>>
>>>Cheers.
>>>
>>>Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message