geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Daughtrey <er...@schemacity.org>
Subject Re: Apache mini Geronimo (mini-G)
Date Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:07:51 GMT


Agreed.  I was a just a little predisposed to an answer given the particular 
project I'm undertaking. 

 On Monday 19 December 2005 20:41, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> In truth, I think we can go further in allowing for a "mini-Geronimo".
>  For example, right now IIRC the core J2EE configuration contains
> OpenEJB, and we could probably break out OpenEJB into a separate
> configuration to let you easily configure a server without it.  I
> think I've been convinced that more/smaller configurations is the way
> to go, though we haven't figured out for sure how granular they should
> get.
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>
> On 12/19/05, Jan Bartel <janb@mortbay.com> wrote:
> > Faisal,
> >
> > You can use either standalone Tomcat or Jetty containers to give
> > you web container plus a couple of j2ee frills like jndi, resource
> > mapping etc etc.
> >
> > However, if you want to keep within the geronimo idiom, then Erik's
> > answer re cut-down installation is the way to go.
> >
> > regards
> > Jan
> >
> > Wade Chandler wrote:
> > > --- Faisal Akeel <faisal.akeel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

wrote:
> > >>If you look at the top reason that FireFox more
> > >>preferred over Mozilla
> > >>suite, this is because its small size and limited
> > >>focus feature.
> > >>So, Is there way to customize Geronimo to a simple
> > >>web container (jetty) and
> > >>small foot print database (derby) only, instead of
> > >>big J2EE application and
> > >>if it possible can anyone provide guide or a demo
> > >>example on the wiki web
> > >>site.
> > >>Some people like mini cooper over big SUV car.
> > >
> > > That's what Tomcat is for.
> > >
> > > Wade

-- 

Regards,

Erik

Mime
View raw message