Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63893 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2005 22:21:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2005 22:21:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 11134 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2005 22:21:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10936 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2005 22:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10924 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2005 22:21:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:21:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of brett.porter@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.203 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.203] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.203) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:21:23 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so653889wxd for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:21:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AQDV7OukvfXtjJ5t6B5cmx0iT/cT/AGjnZSqB9HO8oRP553K8BhSkxkXy5+lZwN1+kvjvkPn2bzMcQDqALj4Hj2gYfIhCL2dAmfSMrML76l4K/WNZOA6MpNkr9jxR70dOan8frz2wOg+4/vFMLDUJm9RgmXjOqA+F/d455JlueY= Received: by 10.70.10.16 with SMTP id 16mr2752418wxj; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:21:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.40.13 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:21:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9e3862d80511011421t1920d5e8k585c1933a5930918@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:21:06 +1100 From: Brett Porter To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Geronimo In-Reply-To: <80DC7368-EEBF-4A2E-BB97-595E31C67324@visi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <13860683.1130827860116.JavaMail.continuum@stan.gbuild.org> <43676281.2080301@gmail.com> <43676398.7090708@gmail.com> <27742888-5CE5-42B7-A277-5322D9747561@visi.com> <4367D638.20704@gmail.com> <80DC7368-EEBF-4A2E-BB97-595E31C67324@visi.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 11/2/05, David Blevins wrote: > > That's cool. Continuum gets smart enough to do things like report > which test failed, etc. when you are dealing with a maven 1 or 2 > project. Up to you if that is worth the trade-off of loosing > project.xml inheritance. You can always poke at it later if you > like. You could also convert to m2 and keep the inheritance if you > are interested in the "smarter" continuum support. You shouldn't need to get rid of inheritence, just only build the common root (which I thought you were doing anyway). Note that this doesn't affect m2 at all as the parents are referenced from the repository, not the file system. Certainly a feature for Continuum 1.1. > > I'd really like to flatten the inheritance in Geronimo but there are > like 40+ modules compared to 4 in the devtools. I'm jealous :) I don't think flattening is a good goal, its an important tool in factoring the build correctly. Cheers, Brett