Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36015 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2005 20:11:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2005 20:11:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 71381 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2005 20:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 71335 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2005 20:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 71324 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2005 20:11:21 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:11:21 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of bruce.snyder@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.194] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:11:17 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t16so85141wxc for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:11:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MA/1HfNQs5r2hxQ/+Vzx4kF59pXWzYn6C0EQTPO0RTGaLg/UuPuTmUOWQ0IMbn5m+/HauvKh7rnwyFCVBIGt50m4Ou+MeXYYRo8HHtcALVep4bTJIH3+dHP2zjkiyhl+Fs5h3rMoGG77QaJD5uTqIt724rI1/seYn/GyGkajFmc= Received: by 10.65.53.8 with SMTP id f8mr2140212qbk; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.124.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:11:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7b3355cb0511021211m568c2d93sf9ab65e8140ba0ec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:11:00 -0700 From: Bruce Snyder To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Old branches (was: Old tags in Geornimo) In-Reply-To: <9501D61D-E625-41DC-B5AB-57F9D751249B@visi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4363AB45.8060105@toolazydogs.com> <7B793CA3-50ED-4BD3-8A82-9E87388AD174@visi.com> <7b3355cb0511020918w34020d36m17041205e77b5a1e@mail.gmail.com> <1FE15B16-7D59-4738-BFDE-D4398BD8A554@visi.com> <7b3355cb0511021119n3b91ec21i2746c8173101b0eb@mail.gmail.com> <9501D61D-E625-41DC-B5AB-57F9D751249B@visi.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 11/2/05, David Blevins wrote: > > One minor clarification. IMO, tags should remain intact forever. > > Therefore a tag should be copied to the branches dir, not moved. But I > > digress... ;-). > > > > Awesome. That's my preference as well, just didn't want to be > inflexible and wasn't sure if you meant "therefore be moved" as in > "svn move". > > Can you +1 my proposal for clarity? I did that for the original message that started this discussion thread two days ago. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=3D6-E+G-N>61E