Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=1ykoiK2wY3rTAJlb1ig1ljaFJKAd+K+jTVqfuw46p/vpGviop8QkJrjVw41aoOSfUD9rFfp7ACPi0gIrK+/nxNaQAOXE1Xk6p/KXJqunSJ3WeRq4+ZaOOWTsdsCVlLK+TYhCSovnfhnZVDNdLtLluAm3Uy6amwAgbFvaSep31OI=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
In-Reply-To: <c278ac970511160820o25ca9398i6618996f0fa58d97@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8F117A98-94BA-49D6-83CE-7C6763534BC8@visi.com>
 <638E0E16-A8E8-4493-82DB-3FE0A5205C65@iq80.com>
 <c278ac970511091508n1aa15f42se28106af19028d5e@mail.gmail.com>
 <7C66613E-10BF-4733-A80E-F8CB03C42387@visi.com> <4372CBFF.1030407@apache.org>
 <15136D85-8980-4FEA-B0AF-C6735D8EDF02@visi.com>
 <c278ac970511100805g39273892pb193aebf0761d916@mail.gmail.com>
 <c278ac970511111100u382abd8et9cf79d78d5b03069@mail.gmail.com>
 <4a2a97357430d187403e71254e1ce220@yahoo.com>
 <9e3862d80511112031m4c57c79fp7a4eddfee8020943@mail.gmail.com>
 <c278ac970511160820o25ca9398i6618996f0fa58d97@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Message-Id: <67d127266f511f8bcea6d412d66823a1@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: m2: flushing out our dependencies
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:13:23 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Nov 16, 2005, at 8:20 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:

> Of the 14 missing jars, I was able to track down all but 5. I had some=20=

> Qs about those 5 -
>
> castor ||=A0castor || 0.9.9 || 0.9.9.1 exists. Update pom to use this =
?
what is using castor?  I think pluto is, anything else?

> org.apache.geronimo.fake ||=A0m2assembly || 1.0-SNAPSHOT || ???
no idea... obviously it is supposed to be something we control...

> activemq || activemq-core-test || 3.2 || can't trace this yet.
I doubt we actually need this, can you figure out what tries to pull it=20=

in?

> javacc || javacc || 2.1 || [WARNING] This artifact has been relocated=20=

> to javax.sql:jdbc-stdext:2.0.
It seems to me that this must be a mistake somewhere.

> xmlbeans || xmlbeans-jsr173-api || 2.0-dev || can't trace this yet.
for the m1 build we are using stax/jars/stax-api-1.0.jar.  Again, can=20
you trace where this requirement comes from?  Is there a generic m2=20
tool to trace where missing dependencies are required?

thanks
david jencks
>
>
> Suggestions ? Advice ?
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> =A0On 11/11/05, Brett Porter <brett.porter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Certainly, they should be put into the main repository (via an
>> evangelism issue). For the specs ones, these are probably older than
>> trunk that has the poms - but I'd expect them to be the same or
>> similar - so definitely use those. They'll still need to be uploaded.
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 11/12/05, David Jencks < david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:00 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>> >
>> > > I'm done creating poms for the 17 modules in the attached text=20
>> file.
>> > >
>> > >=A0=A0I was able to get some jars (same version and all) from the =
M1
>> > > repository. I need to track down the other jars.
>> > >
>> > >=A0=A0Next I need to figure out how to create a patch from the=20
>> repository
>> > > jars. TortoiseSVN doesn't seem to help me there. Any tips here=20
>> would
>> > > be appreciated.
>> > >
>> > >=A0=A0Should I create 1 JIRA for all these 17 modules or should =
each=20
>> module
>> > > have it's own JIRA ?
>> > >
>> > >=A0=A0Cheers
>> > >=A0=A0Prasad
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > I'm worried=A0=A0that duplicate work is happening.=A0=A0 The =
geronimo-specs
>> > already have an m2 build so I would=A0=A0think they all have valid =
m2=20
>> poms.
>> >=A0=A0 I believe jeff genender has valid activemq poms from his work =
with
>> > wadi.
>> >
>> > I certainly don't know what should happen with these poms now that=20=

>> they
>> > exist.=A0=A0I don't think keeping them private to geronimo is =
likely to=20
>> be
>> > the best practice.=A0=A0Should we open one issue/pom in maven=20
>> evangelism?
>> > Jason? Brett?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > david jencks
>> >
>> >