Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-20477-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 75751 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2005 03:53:14 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2005 03:53:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 74405 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2005 03:53:12 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74355 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2005 03:53:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74342 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2005 03:53:12 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:53:12 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.181.65.237] (HELO sun.savoirtech.com) (209.181.65.237)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:54:41 -0800
Received: from [206.197.197.15] ([206.197.197.15])
	by sun.savoirtech.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAU3qmrA013941
	for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:52:48 -0700
Message-ID: <438D2219.8070603@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:52:57 -0700
From: Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org>
Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
Organization: Apache Geronimo
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Configuration start order
References: <C9E41B25-000B-4A74-916C-893310F66F16@iq80.com>
 <ACC5AF58-D0F5-4273-99D4-212F86E261AB@iq80.com>
In-Reply-To: <ACC5AF58-D0F5-4273-99D4-212F86E261AB@iq80.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on sun.savoirtech.com
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1198/Tue Nov 29 03:05:20 2005 on
 sun.savoirtech.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.9 required=5.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
	USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.4
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

I think it should go in the j2ee-server plan.  IMHO the security should 
be available for all web apps, whether its used or not.  I think it will 
be a PITA if every web app requires that import.

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> That was the problem.  I added the following to 
> webconsole-jetty-plan.xml and webconsole-tomcat-plan.xml:
> 
>     <import>
>       <uri>org/apache/geronimo/Security</uri>
>     </import>
> 
> and the problem went away.  Is this something we want in the console 
> plans or in the j2ee-server plan?
> 
> -dain
> 
> On Nov 29, 2005, at 7:29 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> 
>> I have been hacking on the configuration code, and I think I have 
>> stumbled into an unrelated bug.
>>
>> The problem I'm having is caused by the 
>> org/apache/geronimo/Console/Jetty configuration starting before the 
>> org/apache/geronimo/Security configuration.  Which mean when the 
>> console starts and attempts to initialize JACC is gets 
>> "java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Property 
>> javax.security.jacc.PolicyConfigurationFactory.provider not set" 
>> because the provider system property is set in the security 
>> configuration.
>>
>> Should I make the security configuration a parent of the j2ee-server?
>>
>> -dain