Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44408 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2005 22:00:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2005 22:00:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 39997 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2005 22:00:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 39943 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2005 22:00:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 39931 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2005 22:00:35 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:00:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [194.25.134.17] (HELO mailout02.sul.t-online.com) (194.25.134.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:02:08 -0800 Received: from fwd26.aul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Ecrnh-0004gz-01; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:00:13 +0100 Received: from [192.168.6.100] (SOXi9kZDQeYqwqA7GOpNAPxvdUbb6pduetFXq3D5T9BDPbJTsJlE0-@[84.141.225.33]) by fwd26.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1Ecrnf-0hMVAO0; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:00:11 +0100 Message-ID: <437CFEDD.5010002@t-online.de> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:06:21 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_K=FChne?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Geronimo ORB progress References: <437B033A.6030801@trifork.com> <153F7616-4E41-4AD7-8ADA-A17BB7DAB3C4@visi.com> <437B3EF0.2030006@trifork.com> <68B384D2-E376-411C-851E-50AA9C7E269D@visi.com> <437CB517.7070407@trifork.com> In-Reply-To: <437CB517.7070407@trifork.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: SOXi9kZDQeYqwqA7GOpNAPxvdUbb6pduetFXq3D5T9BDPbJTsJlE0- X-TOI-MSGID: 9c3ffd1d-154e-435d-a6bd-3ac09489141a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote: >> Just to give you some direct guidance, you probably should have shot >> an email out to the group saying "what do you guys do for testing >> when more than one VM is involved" or "we have this idea for testing >> in more than one VM, what do you think?" > > > You are right, and I apologise. Open source development is new to us, > and we need to get used to communicating more verbosely by email so we > don't reinvent the wheel, or work in different directions, and > generally keeps everyone informed on the progress of the project. > > I will be busy elsewhere for the rest of the week, but I will have a > close look at the itest plugin when I get back. > > Kresten currently works full time on the ORB implementation and a lot > of progress is being made here. Kresten, what exactly are you working on? I have some code locally that implements simple things like ORB.list_initial_services, string_to_object, etc. I plan to finish this up this weekend and send a patch. Writing an ORB is not my day job, so I only have a few hours per week and I'd like to avoid duplicate work. If you Trifork guys could send short announcements like "we'll start working on xyz now" that would be cool. Maybe this could also be done via JIRA, create issues and assign them to yourself when you start working on them - this will give external contributors like myself a better view what's planned and where help is most useful. Lars