Done. Geronimo and Geronimo-dev issues now have a custom "Patch" field at the bottom of the issue. Here is a report: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? mode=hide&requestId=12310367 Now I'll try to figure out the security issue raised by brett. -dain On Nov 1, 2005, at 2:37 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > I like this suggestion for when you only want to pull up a list of > JIRAs that have patches attached (very creative). > > One of the other things I was hoping to use this for was to look at > a release, component, whatever .... and see how many potential > fixes we already had and how many are still "untouched". It would > also be a good way for non-committers to see what items are open > and waiting for attention. We could do the inverse of the "patch" > search but it would be nice to see both types in one view with some > differentiation. > > Joe > > > Brett Porter wrote: > >> Not as far as I know. I'm tracking a JIRA ticket at Atlassian for the >> ability to detect the existence of an attachment, but that stiff >> doen't designate if its a patch unfortunately. >> In our project we just query for "patch" in any of the text >> fields. We >> generally find that people type that somewhere when attaching it. >> - Brett >> On 11/2/05, Joe Bohn wrote: >> >>> Is there any way to get a view of JIRAs that have files(patches) >>> attached? >>> >>> If not, can we begin some kind of convention? I noticed that >>> some folks >>> have added (Patch) to the start of the title for a few JIRAs. Do >>> you >>> think that would be helpful? >>> >>> I image it must be a pain for the committers to get a view of the >>> available patches. >>> >>> Any other suggestions? Anybody how other projects manage this? >>> >>> Joe >>> >