geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Proposed changes to plan elements related to classloaders.
Date Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:35:30 GMT
On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> On 11/18/05, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Dain has a plan that I hope he will explain soon that should make  
>>> all
>>> of these elements identical in form, name, and function.   
>>> Dependency is
>>> what maven calls them and I don't see a strong reason to change  
>>> their
>>> name.
>>
>> If there's a plan on the way, why are we discussing this before we
>> hear the plan?  Dain, speak up, man!
>
> IIUC his plan requires maven 2 so won't be feasible for geronimo 1.0

I'm going to try to type it up tomorrow (traveling tomorrow so should  
have free time on the airplane).  One of the parts of the idea is to  
use maven-artifact from maven 2 to manage the repository and to help  
with class loader building, so staying close to the maven 2 xml  
format will help.

-dain

Mime
View raw message