geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Proposed changes to plan elements related to classloaders.
Date Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:12:56 GMT

On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> There is a JIRA issue I re-opened on those classes tags.  They are 
> duped in Tomcat and Jetty.  I would like to see them at the web 
> builder level.

I noticed they were missing from the generic schema.  My local changes 
use the same group everywhere including web-builder, so this would fix 
your issue?

thanks
david jencks

>
> David Jencks wrote:
>> It's become apparent recently that some of the elements in our plans 
>> related to classloading are a bit confusing.  In particular, there is 
>> an include element that no one is sure what is for and is not used, 
>> and a similarly named import element that is like the parentId, only 
>> better :-).  Also the lists of special classes for the classloader 
>> are in between the import and dependency elements.
>> I'd like to change the schema for all plans to use this:
>>     <xs:group name="classloader-infoGroup">
>>         <xs:sequence>
>>             <xs:element ref="sys:parent" minOccurs="0" 
>> maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>             <!--            <xs:element name="include" 
>> type="sys:dependencyType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>-->
>>             <xs:element ref="sys:dependency" minOccurs="0" 
>> maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>             <xs:element ref="sys:hidden-classes" minOccurs="0" 
>> maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>             <xs:element ref="sys:non-overridable-classes" 
>> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
>>         </xs:sequence>
>>     </xs:group>
>> The differences are that:
>> import is renamed parent.  This seems less confusing to me.  I can 
>> support backwards compatibility in most plans, although perhaps not 
>> plain gbean plans.
>> include is removed.
>> the class lists are moved to the end.  This makes more sense to me, 
>> in that first we have the info on what goes into the current 
>> classloader in the way of parents and contents, and then we have the 
>> modifications to that list.
>> Comments?
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>


Mime
View raw message