geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <sppat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ApahceCon is T-26 days (or there abouts) thoughts about branching?
Date Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:48:42 GMT
Yep, thats what I got.

sachin

Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Yup, good catch.  I think the default configId is the module name
> without its file extension -- can you confirm that's what you got (by
> running deployer.jar list-modules, for example)?
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron
>
> On 11/14/05, Sachin Patel <sppatel2@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>     
>>> Anyway, on your list, hot deploy directory is done, but it would be
>>> nice if people could test it and make sure there aren't any issues.
>>> And I haven't actually been working on remote deployment yet, though I
>>> still mean to.  :)
>>>
>>>       
>> Just did a quick smoke test of the hot deploy.  Looks good.  However
>> when I ran a scenario where if I dropped in a war without
>> an embedded plan, the deploy was successful, but when deleting the file
>> to trigger an undeploy the following
>> exception occurred....
>>
>> 17:40:06,506 ERROR [DirectoryHotDeployer] Unable to undeploy
>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>         at
>> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.cli.DeployUtils.identifyTargetModuleIDs(DeployUtils.java:113)
>>         at
>> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.hot.DirectoryHotDeployer.fileUpdated(DirectoryHotDeployer.java:215)
>>         at
>> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.hot.DirectoryMonitor.scanDirectory(DirectoryMonitor.java:200)
>>         at
>> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.hot.DirectoryMonitor.run(DirectoryMonitor.java:140)
>>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:552)
>>
>> Can we fall back on the module name as the configID if there is no plan,
>> or whatever default is being used when no plan is provided.
>>
>> Sachin
>>
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message