Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=V/dG53LyGKQvxWKnnWjadMNSuF2rGL67DwuSKD21RfD/6Uqe0cuvrit7aDn1TegdipLWSb5xhaAWuWpvNOZibYUBVE4rb9z8SL0mWqxh4BqQfDG14rveVVafu2zp9pycddN79wEqri2xHjbsfOP4LdVcgGnidn6BOYLrWCRJ+yo=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
In-Reply-To: <09A44F62-18E7-42E7-B2D6-CCB1023FC17F@visi.com>
References: <2f8560424082c7b0e71d6c7ebe5ca767@yahoo.com>
 <81DF82ED-7383-4C47-8B10-33757BC69473@apache.org>
 <74e15baa0510020800o78740924xec130de9cccaf3c9@mail.gmail.com>
 <97d743854acc4e936cec7ee1a75a2a9a@yahoo.com>
 <74e15baa0510021424q42a6c06dme9623248368e65cd@mail.gmail.com>
 <5dc7960c34a28f416cc8a92c759d8a98@yahoo.com>
 <74e15baa0510021805p4077010dy1ea65d6721955374@mail.gmail.com>
 <AB0B6762-90C4-4814-B66B-C3B2D349C7CC@apache.org>
 <74e15baa0510022111r4c8c443bja0d8ea56de1a2bb3@mail.gmail.com>
 <473375d6df4232a5e6521893b8513589@yahoo.com>
 <09A44F62-18E7-42E7-B2D6-CCB1023FC17F@visi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <836b93bcd7256691f0a5b9c17b47b195@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] -- M5 release -- (Was Re: 1.0-M5 candidate build)
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 23:40:55 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

First, the good news:

All the tck tests pass for the 1.0-M5 candidate build for both jetty 
and tomcat!

Unfortunately, there seems to be a problem with the 
geronimo-installer.jar.  It works fine for jetty but the tomcat 
included does not seem to include GERONIMO-1036: the tomcat 
configurations are not relocatable.

I've done some experiments and it appears that the zip distro does 
include this fix, and "reverse engineering" the zip distro into an 
installer also includes this fix (but has other problems).  So, I think 
david used the wrong copy of geronimo to build the installer and we 
will have to try again tomorrow.

Thanks
david jencks

On Oct 2, 2005, at 10:15 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> Ta-da!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/geronimo-installer.jar
>
> -David
>
> On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:49 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geirm@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care to 
>>>> vote?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to vote -1 until there's an installer package available,
>>> but it seemed like it would be rude.  So now I'm hoping that the vote
>>> drags on long enough for David and I to work out the path to the
>>> installer.  :)
>>>
>>
>> I've managed to convince myself that we can claim the tests we have 
>> already run cover the installer version as well as the zip version 
>> since they include exactly the same jar files, directory structure, 
>> and configurations.  The only difference is in the config.xml and 
>> config.list files, which are changed to run the tck anyway.  I would 
>> prefer in the future that the Izpack stuff be run from a maven plugin 
>> and integrated in the build and work by unpacking or including the 
>> zip distribution, but am willing to use what we have for M5.  David 
>> Blevins is working on building an installer.  With luck it will be 
>> available shortly.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Well, as soon as IzPack 3.8 goes final, it should be in Maven -- 
>>>>> the
>>>>> previous release is.  I would be happy to make that a condition of
>>>>> Geronimo 1.0, but I don't think it's necessary for M5.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's fine with me if the installer is build by unpacking the
>>>>> assembly zip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/2/05, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think there are a couple of issues:
>>>>>> 1. It is a really lot of work to run the tck, and I'm not up for
>>>>>> doing
>>>>>> it again for a while.  I would prefer to find a way to claim that 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> geronimo installer is covered by the tests run on the zip distro. 
>>>>>>  I
>>>>>> would be quite happy claiming this if the installer was built by
>>>>>> unpacking the zip into the installer directory rather than copying
>>>>>> all/most of the files.  It's probably fine if we build the 
>>>>>> installer
>>>>>> using the same assembly directory, but I'd like some other
>>>>>> opinions on
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Related to the above, we should build the installer on the same
>>>>>> assembly module copy as the zip.  That's one of David Blevin's
>>>>>> machines, so he should do it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, if we can distribute our own Axis, I'm sure we can 
>>>>>>> distribute
>>>>>>> our own IzPack.  But really, I don't think there's a compelling 
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> to, since no one needs IzPack to install or run the product.  
>>>>>>> (Also,
>>>>>>> you say you couldn't get a copy for yourself, but that's only
>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>> the download was troublesome for you, right?  If I had a nickel 
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> every time ibiblio crapped out... :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ibiblio sometimes has problems, but it is a well known well
>>>>>> advertised
>>>>>> site with automated downloads and usually works fine.  Stuff
>>>>>> available
>>>>>> from it has at least theoretically been officially released by its
>>>>>> authors.  The current version of izpack is on a secret site that 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> need a password for and that in my experience has not yet worked. 
>>>>>>  It
>>>>>> has not been officially released and I have no idea how it was 
>>>>>> built.
>>>>>> I'm not sure how much of an issue I have with this for M5 but I
>>>>>> really
>>>>>> don't want to continue this state of affairs through the next
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>> I think izpack has to be run from maven.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone else have an opinion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/2/05, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cool.  Can you publish a candidate installer, too?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> well, I'm not sure.  I see two potential problems, aside from 
>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>> tired right now to put it together :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. We aren't set up to certify it, how would we make it clear
>>>>>>>> that the
>>>>>>>> installer version wasn't certified?  Or is it certified???  I'd
>>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>> to find a way to certify the installer based version.  I think 
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be easy to build the installer using maven, but I'm not sure 
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>> unpacking/running it to get something to test.  If we found a
>>>>>>>> way to
>>>>>>>> make the installer include the certified zip distribution and 
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> unpack it and change the config.* files I don't think this would
>>>>>>>> be an
>>>>>>>> issue.  Maybe it's ok to claim the installer is certified if it 
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> built from the same assembly as the zip.  I'm just not sure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. It's built with unreleased software that I at least couldn't 
>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> myself. I suppose that we could include a copy of the installer 
>>>>>>>> kit
>>>>>>>> version we use, as we have included a copy of axis.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway I hope we can figure out a way to answer these questions
>>>>>>>> so we
>>>>>>>> can put out a installer version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>     Aaron
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geirm@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (just making it clear for others)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> geir
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The 1.0-M5  branch passed all the tck tests, so David Blevins
>>>>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>>>>> have tagged geronimo and openejb and built a candidate 1.0-M5
>>>>>>>>>>> zip.
>>>>>>>>>>> We are running the tck on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The zip is available for testing at
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/geronimo-1.0-M5.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We'd like to call for a vote on a release based on this tag
>>>>>>>>>>> conditional on the tck passing (again).  I think the process
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> be that after the vote we would work on publishing the jars,
>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>> zip distribution, and a source distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr
>>>>>>>>>> +1-203-665-6437
>>>>>>>>>> geirm@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
>>>> geirm@apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>