Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16119 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2005 18:45:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2005 18:45:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 46007 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2005 18:45:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 45964 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2005 18:45:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 45953 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2005 18:45:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:45:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [216.136.174.114] (HELO smtp017.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.174.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:45:01 -0700 Received: (qmail 33732 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2005 18:25:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Content-Type:To:From:Subject:Date:X-Mailer; b=eFgL7nwXdH6gL8w+3y9mdO1rHS9OJJ8ORE3ZCTrJM/3Wd+WM2+4ZzV+m16P/aekUZl5h90uW+4tkChobHtGl6u3I9/5eKC9es8gXjkqm4vnCazVIxeEsAYYpQ09mm4oW8c9CE8k4bt2A3d+y8M/rV8D4mA3lcAsNBMUFJAIHZrI= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (david?jencks@66.93.38.137 with plain) by smtp017.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2005 18:25:37 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <732979ab3964e1c072916939c671eb97@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: dev@geronimo.apache.org From: David Jencks Subject: Should keystore gbean be moved to security from console? Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:25:33 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I just committed GERONIMO-887 which includes a keystore management gbean in the console application. I would think this would be of more general use and the code should be in the security module and the gbean deployed in the security configuration. Comments? thanks david jencks