Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1991 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2005 04:52:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2005 04:52:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3895 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2005 04:52:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 3283 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2005 04:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 3272 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2005 04:52:53 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:52:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [128.241.244.71] (HELO chi.mobile-health-diary.com) (128.241.244.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:52:58 -0700 Received: (qmail 5771 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2005 04:52:30 -0000 Received: from ool-43560634.dyn.optonline.net (HELO ?10.0.1.16?) (geir@67.86.6.52) by b014.internal.mobile-health-diary.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2005 04:52:30 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: <473375d6df4232a5e6521893b8513589@yahoo.com> References: <2f8560424082c7b0e71d6c7ebe5ca767@yahoo.com> <81DF82ED-7383-4C47-8B10-33757BC69473@apache.org> <74e15baa0510020800o78740924xec130de9cccaf3c9@mail.gmail.com> <97d743854acc4e936cec7ee1a75a2a9a@yahoo.com> <74e15baa0510021424q42a6c06dme9623248368e65cd@mail.gmail.com> <5dc7960c34a28f416cc8a92c759d8a98@yahoo.com> <74e15baa0510021805p4077010dy1ea65d6721955374@mail.gmail.com> <74e15baa0510022111r4c8c443bja0d8ea56de1a2bb3@mail.gmail.com> <473375d6df4232a5e6521893b8513589@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <105B4C31-7198-4BC3-8BF8-F2B8DBE6B470@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: [VOTE] -- M5 release -- (Was Re: 1.0-M5 candidate build) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:52:57 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Excellent! The post I just hit "send" for is moot... geir On Oct 3, 2005, at 12:49 AM, David Jencks wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:11 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > >> On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> >>> Aaron - how do you feel about actually releasing this... care to >>> vote? >>> >> >> I would like to vote -1 until there's an installer package available, >> but it seemed like it would be rude. So now I'm hoping that the vote >> drags on long enough for David and I to work out the path to the >> installer. :) >> > > I've managed to convince myself that we can claim the tests we have > already run cover the installer version as well as the zip version > since they include exactly the same jar files, directory structure, > and configurations. The only difference is in the config.xml and > config.list files, which are changed to run the tck anyway. I > would prefer in the future that the Izpack stuff be run from a > maven plugin and integrated in the build and work by unpacking or > including the zip distribution, but am willing to use what we have > for M5. David Blevins is working on building an installer. With > luck it will be available shortly. > > thanks > david jencks > > > >> >> Aaron >> >> >>> On Oct 2, 2005, at 9:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Well, as soon as IzPack 3.8 goes final, it should be in Maven -- >>>> the >>>> previous release is. I would be happy to make that a condition of >>>> Geronimo 1.0, but I don't think it's necessary for M5. >>>> >>>> It's fine with me if the installer is build by unpacking the >>>> assembly zip. >>>> >>>> Aaron >>>> >>>> On 10/2/05, David Jencks wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I think there are a couple of issues: >>>>> 1. It is a really lot of work to run the tck, and I'm not up for >>>>> doing >>>>> it again for a while. I would prefer to find a way to claim >>>>> that the >>>>> geronimo installer is covered by the tests run on the zip >>>>> distro. I >>>>> would be quite happy claiming this if the installer was built by >>>>> unpacking the zip into the installer directory rather than copying >>>>> all/most of the files. It's probably fine if we build the >>>>> installer >>>>> using the same assembly directory, but I'd like some other >>>>> opinions on >>>>> this. >>>>> >>>>> 2. Related to the above, we should build the installer on the same >>>>> assembly module copy as the zip. That's one of David Blevin's >>>>> machines, so he should do it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Also, if we can distribute our own Axis, I'm sure we can >>>>>> distribute >>>>>> our own IzPack. But really, I don't think there's a >>>>>> compelling need >>>>>> to, since no one needs IzPack to install or run the product. >>>>>> (Also, >>>>>> you say you couldn't get a copy for yourself, but that's only >>>>>> because >>>>>> the download was troublesome for you, right? If I had a >>>>>> nickel for >>>>>> every time ibiblio crapped out... :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ibiblio sometimes has problems, but it is a well known well >>>>> advertised >>>>> site with automated downloads and usually works fine. Stuff >>>>> available >>>>> from it has at least theoretically been officially released by its >>>>> authors. The current version of izpack is on a secret site >>>>> that you >>>>> need a password for and that in my experience has not yet >>>>> worked. It >>>>> has not been officially released and I have no idea how it was >>>>> built. >>>>> I'm not sure how much of an issue I have with this for M5 but I >>>>> really >>>>> don't want to continue this state of affairs through the next >>>>> release. >>>>> I think izpack has to be run from maven. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone else have an opinion? >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> david jencks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Aaron >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/2/05, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cool. Can you publish a candidate installer, too? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> well, I'm not sure. I see two potential problems, aside from >>>>>>> being >>>>>>> too >>>>>>> tired right now to put it together :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. We aren't set up to certify it, how would we make it clear >>>>>>> that the >>>>>>> installer version wasn't certified? Or is it certified??? I'd >>>>>>> prefer >>>>>>> to find a way to certify the installer based version. I >>>>>>> think it >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> be easy to build the installer using maven, but I'm not sure >>>>>>> about >>>>>>> unpacking/running it to get something to test. If we found a >>>>>>> way to >>>>>>> make the installer include the certified zip distribution and >>>>>>> just >>>>>>> unpack it and change the config.* files I don't think this would >>>>>>> be an >>>>>>> issue. Maybe it's ok to claim the installer is certified if >>>>>>> it is >>>>>>> built from the same assembly as the zip. I'm just not sure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. It's built with unreleased software that I at least >>>>>>> couldn't get >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> myself. I suppose that we could include a copy of the >>>>>>> installer kit >>>>>>> version we use, as we have included a copy of axis. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyway I hope we can figure out a way to answer these questions >>>>>>> so we >>>>>>> can put out a installer version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Aaron >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/2/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (just making it clear for others) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 from me >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for the incredible work to make this happen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> geir >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Oct 2, 2005, at 8:15 AM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The 1.0-M5 branch passed all the tck tests, so David Blevins >>>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>> have tagged geronimo and openejb and built a candidate 1.0-M5 >>>>>>>>>> zip. >>>>>>>>>> We are running the tck on this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The zip is available for testing at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/geronimo-1.0-M5.zip >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We'd like to call for a vote on a release based on this tag >>>>>>>>>> conditional on the tck passing (again). I think the process >>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> be that after the vote we would work on publishing the jars, >>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> zip distribution, and a source distribution. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Many thanks, >>>>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr >>>>>>>>> +1-203-665-6437 >>>>>>>>> geirm@apache.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 >>> geirm@apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 geirm@apache.org