From dev-return-17818-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org Mon Oct 03 21:46:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92931 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2005 21:46:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2005 21:46:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 20534 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2005 21:46:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 20469 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2005 21:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 20458 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2005 21:46:03 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:46:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of david.blevins@visi.com designates 208.42.156.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [208.42.156.2] (HELO conn.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:46:06 -0700 Received: from [192.168.42.12] (68-171-56-105.vnnyca.adelphia.net [68.171.56.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F0D825E for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 16:45:40 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: <433D8638.30902@hogstrom.org> References: <433D3949.7060001@hogstrom.org> <433D5726.8030301@hogstrom.org> <52345.12.17.202.43.1128099051.squirrel@mirage.savoirtech.com> <433D8638.30902@hogstrom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Blevins Subject: Re: Logo Contest Update - The Final Days Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:45:22 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N 11 is my favorite as well. -David On Sep 30, 2005, at 11:38 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Totally agree with your comments and I think all of them should be > included (11 is my personal favorite as well) :) > > That's why I called them out to make sure there were no surprises > at the end. > > If you have a reference to what Noel said that would be great :) > > - Matt > > Jeff Genender wrote: > >> What is wrong with some of the others? Example, #11...I thought >> that the >> headress and its history was made clear by Noel, and thus was >> acceptable. Also I assume the headress is a native american symbol >> (a lot more >> feathers), not an image of a native american. >> Please correct me if I am wrong. (I know...I REALLY like #11 and >> want it >> to have a fair shake). ;-) >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >>> Based on the criteria below I think the following images meet the >>> parameters: >>> >>> Entry # 2 URL: http://www.flyermoney.com/geronimo/ >>> Entry # 3 URL: http://elegoff.free.fr/geronimo/ >>> Entry # 4 URL: http://www.ashishgokhale.com/geronimo.htm >>> Entry # 9 URL: http://www.structuredview.com/geronimo/index.html >>> Entry # 12 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos1.jpg >>> Entry # 13 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos2.jpg >>> Entry # 14 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos3.jpg >>> Entry # 15 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos5.jpg >>> Entry # 16 URL: http://eischen.free.fr/gero/index.html >>> >>> >>> Links that need to be discussed: >>> These entries use a headdress (which is a bunch of feathers). >>> Entry # 7 URL: http://amethystpublishing.com/Apache%20Geronimo.htm >>> Entry # 10 URL: http://www.structuredview.com/armitage/index.html >>> Entry # 11 URL: http://www.media-style.com/geronimo/ >>> >>> My personal preference on these is that they should be allowable. I >>> prefer to judge based on merit. I think these are tastefully >>> done. We >>> need a ruling of the PRC on these. >>> >>> >>> Links that are not compatible with the parameters established below: >>> Entry # 6 URL: http://rainhousemedia.com/geronimo/ >>> Entry # 16 URL: >>> http://www.epiqtech.com/corp/products/technology/opensource/ >>> geronimo.htm >>> >>> Links that no longer are functional and could not be verified: >>> Entry # 5 URL: http://www.morpheuschameleon.net/GeronimoLogo/ >>> Entry # 8 URL: http://ericlegoff.homelinux.org/geronimo.html >>> >>> - Matt >>> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Sep 30, 2005, at 9:10 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> >>>>> The Logo contest has inspired many to get their creative juices >>>>> flowing and put some great effort into designing some excellent >>>>> artwork. Unfortunately, we can't use every one of the items >>>>> that have >>>>> been donated so we'll have to pare them down to a single winner. >>>>> >>>>> As of this morning there are 17 Entries posted on the Wiki. >>>>> They can >>>>> be found at http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/LogoContest . >>>>> >>>>> I propose the following time line to bring this to a timely >>>>> conclusion. >>>>> >>>>> Allow for last minute changes and additions to the logos so a vote >>>>> can be taken on a finite set of entries. This will be a one week >>>>> period ending at: 23:59 PDT on October 8th. >>>>> >>>>> A one week period for voting by members on the dev and user >>>>> Geronimo >>>>> lists. A voting format will be posted to the list to make >>>>> tabulating >>>>> the results easier. This will come out on Friday October 7th. >>>>> >>>>> Give one week for votes on the final sets of artwork from 00:01 >>>>> Saturday October 8th through 00:01 PDT Saturday October 15th. >>>>> During >>>>> this time, discussion is welcome on the various entries on the >>>>> dev >>>>> list. Please make sure we keep them in a single thread. >>>>> >>>>> As indicated on the Wiki, the PPMC is responsible for the final >>>>> selection but the voting and feedback from the community is >>>>> critical >>>>> to making the best choice. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> s/PPMC/PMC >>>> >>>> >>>> And I'd like to pre-filter based on the PRC guidelines. I've been >>>> discussing with them, and I've asked that they produce a final >>>> set of >>>> guidelines. However, the important one for us will be : >>>> >>>> "logo should not incorporate Native American images or >>>> existing cultural/religious symbolism. However, new symbols that >>>> merely evoke a native american theme (such as the feather) are >>>> fine." >>>> >>>> So I'd like to get rid of the ones that violate this guideline >>>> before >>>> we have the community vote. >>>> >>>> geir >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > >