geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: 1.0 JIRAs
Date Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:28:33 GMT
Done.

I created a "1.x" version.

-dain

On Oct 27, 2005, at 7:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> I just want to be sure we have a reasonable chance of reviewing  
> what Matt (or others) is doing. Maybe it's just me, but I don't  
> think this process has worked very well in the past.
>
> If we end up with a reasonable set of Jira versions (1.0, 1.1, and  
> 1.x seem fine -- "not for 1.0" wasn't a literal suggestion) and a  
> reasonable period of time to review the issues in each version, I'm  
> all for it.
>
> --kevan
>
> On 10/26/05, John Sisson < jsisson@apache.org> wrote: I agree with  
> Matt & Bruce.
>
> Have a 1.1 and 1.x and place issues to be done soon after 1.0 in  
> 1.1 and
> issues to be done in the long term 1.x.
>
> John
>
> Bruce Snyder wrote:
> > On 10/26/05, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'd prefer to move them to 1.x or 1.1 and make the ones for 1.0  
> just 1.0.
> >
> >
> > I agree with Matt. I don't see the point to a not 1.0 bucket. IMO,
> > 1.0, 1.1, 1.x is all we need right now.
> >
> > Bruce
> > --
> > perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D 
> \!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> > );'
> >
> > The Castor Project
> > http://www.castor.org/
> >
> > Apache Geronimo
> > http://geronimo.apache.org/
> >
>


Mime
View raw message