geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>
Subject Re: What do we do about fixable problems in M5?
Date Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:02:59 GMT

On Oct 5, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> Without a really big disclaimer on the download page, my guess is  
> that approximately 100% of new-to-Geronimo M5 Installer users will  
> run into this problem. All you have to do is keep hitting "Next". I  
> did. I just never started my "installed" server, because I'd  
> already tested the zipped/tarred version of code (my mistake).
>
> I don't think an errata is sufficient and I don't see how we can  
> ignore such a visible issue. This may be a bit heretical, but one  
> option is not to release the installer. Although this is a server  
> issue, you don't hit this problem in normal usage when running from  
> an zip/tar "install" (at least I haven't run into any other  
> problems, am I missing something?).
>
> Most first-time users will choose the install download thinking  
> they're making their lives easier, when actually, they've just made  
> their lives more difficult. Although some last-minute hard work  
> went into the installer, IMO, the M5 installer is of limited value  
> for first-time Geronimo users. I also think that the current  
> installer is actually a configuration utility in disguise -- we  
> should start separating concerns...
>
> BTW, I assume that actually fixing the underlying problem means  
> rerunning the TCK tests? Thus the reticence for fixing?

I'm not sure where you are seeing reticence.

If just fixing the installer fixes it, then that's easy.  If the  
problem is only in the installer, we'll just remove that link for now  
from the download page immediately.  Please confirm that it's only  
the installer.

geir


>
> --kevan
>
> On 10/5/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geirm@apache.org> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> > I think that will work but users won't find Geronimo incredibly
> > useful if they have to pull a whole new build to fix a single  
> problem.
>
> Which will work?
>
> i think the errata is necessary so people will know what to do.  As
> for a quick M6?  I think it depends on the %-age of people that will
> hit the problem.
>
> > I discovered a similar problem in TranQL that the 1.1 SNAPSHOT
> > doesn't generate the right SQL syntax for DB2 and had to tweak the
> > Syntax Generator.  So the option going forward is for someone to
> > pull TranQL 1.2-SNAPSHOT which wil most likely break their build
> > too because of the serialization problem (probably not likely with
> > my example but a high probability for other types of fixes).
>
> Does this mean as of now, we have a problem w/ DB2?
>
> >
> > Sachin had the right idea of highlighting the issues with
> > serialVersionUIDs but that was part of a larger problem.  I'll open
> > a feature JIRA that focuses on improved serviceability which would
> > encompass these recurring issues and we'll look for someone to step
> > up to the plate and put a strategy together.
> >
>
> yes, I think that's a different (but very important) issue altogether.
>
>
> > Thoughts?
> >
>
> Go man, go...
>
> > - Matt
> >
> > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >
> >> On Oct 4, 2005, at 11:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> >>
> >>> Stefan Schmidt has found our first configuration problem in M5,
> >>> namely that the listener name in the ejb builder in
> >>> config.tomcat.xml points half to tomcat and half to jetty.  This
> >>> is easy to fix by hand (change JettyWebContainer to
> >>> TomcatWebContainer).  However I doubt we want to rerelease M5 to
> >>> fix this.  What do we want to do about issues like this?  One
> >>> possibility is to have an "errata" page clearly linked from the
> >>> download page.
> >>>
> >> That's a great idea.
> >>
> >>>   There must be some other possibilities, any ideas?
> >>>
> >> 1) Can we capture this as some kind of functional test to prevent
> >> from happening again?
> >> 2) how long would it take to fix on branch/m5 (and head) and do a
> >> M6  tag off of branch/m5 (if people don't find that too
> >> nauseating) and  release that?
> >> geir
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
> geirm@apache.org
>
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org



Mime
View raw message