geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Mulder <ammul...@alumni.princeton.edu>
Subject Re: Trunk Cleanup?
Date Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:19:35 GMT
I don't have any objection to this, but changing the SVN layout
diesn't really excite me either.  Whatever layout "others" prefer is
fine and I can work with it.

That said, it wouldn't break my heart to reduce the amount of stuff in
our main IntelliJ project.  :)

Aaron

On 10/28/05, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
> I sent this proposal a while back and simply forgot about it until
> Alan started working on the specs cleanup.  I think the problem was I
> presented it as one huge change, so this time I'm going to try to
> break it up into tasks I can put into JIRA once approved.
>
> In general the overall structure would be:
>
> geronimo/trunk - Stuff needed for the J2EE server
> geronimo/specs/trunk - Specification API implementations
> geronimo/trunk/console - The J2ee web admin console
> geronimo/examples/*/trunk - Example apps for new users (do we want to
> version these?)
> geronimo/applications/*/trunk - Standalone applications such as
> dayTrader and uddi-server
> geronimo/sandbox/*/ - Play area
> geronimo/contrib/*/ - Tags of the initial import from a donation
>
> * Note the last two don't need to be versioned
>
> What do you think?
>
> -dain
>
> Sandbox
> -------
> I think this should be moved to the root of the tree and be a place
> where any committer can play or experiment freely.  The contrib
> directory in the sandbox seems like it was created as an initial home
> for the initial import new contributions (i.e., a tag of the initial
> import).  I like this idea and think we should move contrib to root
> and attempt to back fill the big initial imports like the console and
> the eclipse plugin.  The other sandbox directory I have questions on
> it petstore.  If it works, I think we should move it to an examples
> directory off of root.
> geronimo/trunk/sandbox                  --> geronimo/sandbox
> geronimo/trunk/sandbox/contrib          --> geronimo/contrib
> geronimo/trunk/sandbox/mail             --> geronimo/sandbox/mail
> geronimo/trunk/sandbox/petstore         --> geronimo/examples/petstore
> geronimo/trunk/sandbox/spring-assembly  --> geronimo/sandbox/spring-
> assembly
> geronimo/trunk/applications/jmxdebug    --> geronimo/sandbox/
> jmxdebug  (I think this need more work or we should simply drop it)
>
>
> Console
> -------
> Aaron correct me if I'm wrong... I assume that the console is tied to
> the version of the Geronimo server it is included with, so it would
> be unreasonable to ship it separately.  Therefore, I think we should
> make move it to the root of trunk
> geronimo/trunk/applications/console-core       --> geronimo/trunk/
> console/core
> geronimo/trunk/applications/console-ear        --> geronimo/trunk/
> console/ear
> geronimo/trunk/applications/console-framework  --> geronimo/trunk/
> console/framework
> geronimo/trunk/applications/console-standard   --> geronimo/trunk/
> console/standard
>
>
> Specs
> -----
> Alan is on this one
>
>
> Applications
> ------------
> There is another thread on this, "Applications directory structure",
> started by Dave Colasurdo.  Whatever comes out of that would be this
> task.
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message