geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <>
Subject Re: [vote] archival of old, unsupported, tags
Date Tue, 01 Nov 2005 02:35:57 GMT
I'm coming in kind of late on this one (been fighting with continuum  
all day)... but it seems like the conversation somehow got polarized  
between remove vs. keep and the proposal is simply to move them (as  
far as I can tell).

So, here is my thoughts ...

We have to move old binaries off the mirrors and over to at some point (i think that's where they go anyway).   
I'm cool with moving the corresponding tag to an archive place in svn  
at the same time.  There is a certain kind of symmetry in that which  
is attractive.

So +1 to archiving the tag when we yank binaries off the mirrors.  (I  
understand that's kind of a modified version of the proposal, so if  
you like the addition, throw a +1 on it for clarity)

I'm not a fan of deleting tags from the repo entirely as svn has this  
cool "cheap copy" concept and I don't see any reason not to take  


On Oct 31, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> It's messy and there is no good reason to keep them.
> I won't argue with messy, but I *will* dispute 'no good
> reason to keep them.'  In fact, I already have. :-)
> - --
> #ken    P-)}
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
> iQCVAwUBQ2a6dZrNPMCpn3XdAQITvAP/b40SsfuretAfikORDk2Uct3jaV59b9DB
> 5B+JthfqK20BC4PO48oLT+6uf727p9i3WHuh10+wjN/Aer6mijQyISZjAbBR137w
> AZTRlVEgEeihomy8ca9aTpFhd8MrahjUKvgDRSCSoX5pJUtT6II/PVMnst3yKPs9
> UNI9KHyqZ4U=
> =WzgK

View raw message