geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.C...@Golux.Com>
Subject Re: Old tags in Geornimo
Date Tue, 01 Nov 2005 03:09:34 GMT
Hash: SHA1

Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> That would not be a friendly way to go.  I am arguing that we remove the
> temptation.

And I'm arguing that revising history is unfriendly.

> I would use this as an argument  for removing milestone tags  as quickly
> as possible.  People should not be building against a milestone tag,
> only a released verison.

LOL!  People have this curious habit of building against
what they want to build against.  And resenting people
who try to tell them they're doing their pet project wrong. :-)

> Using a milestone tag would not be the way to go here.  Subversion
> version numbers work quite nicely here.

Eugh.  Tags are a friendly way of mnemonicising rev numbers.
Telling someone to use a particular transaction number is
*really* unfriendly.  And again, we *don't know* how people
might be using the tags.  Yanking tags out from under them
is pretty unfriendly too.

> Agreed.  I am arguing that *milestone* tags are not the way to support
> the above scenarios.

A milestone represents a significant point in the development.
Until there's a released version that is feature- and bug-
compatible with what they're doing, a milestone reference
is better than anything else.  Why would you want to remove
a reference to an accomplishment?  Rename it perhaps (to
'M1_NO_LONGER_SUPPORTED' or something).

> To what end will someone dig up, say, M3?  A supported tag e.g. v1_0_0
> or v1_0_5 I can see.

That's the point -- we *don't know* why they might.  Customers
are endlessly inventive, particularly at using things in
unanticipated ways.  Maybe they want to graph progress or
change rate between milestones; who knows?  I don't think we
can assume that we can guess ahead of time all possible reasons
all possible people might want to use the tags.

One of the common practices about open development is keeping
history intact.  Forever.  Good and bad.

Again, that's me.  My US$0.02.
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -


View raw message