geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: 1.0 JIRAs
Date Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:34:50 GMT
I'd prefer to move them to 1.x or 1.1 and make the ones for 1.0 just 1.0.

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> 
> On Oct 26, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> 
>> Well, from past experience, I know it can be hard to keep up when a  
>> bunch of Jira's are being changed. I know I had a few M5 surprises.  I 
>> also think we should be a bit stricter for a 1.0 release vs a  
>> milestone release -- both from a content basis and from a  scheduling 
>> perspective. So, we should make sure it's as easy as  possible to 
>> review the jiras.
>>
>> On the flip-side, Jira is the perfect way of listing/viewing the  
>> details of the problems. Is it possible to define a temporary "Not  
>> for 1.0" release in Jira? That way we could easily view the 1.0  
>> candidate jiras, the "not for 1.0" jiras, and the current 1.1  jiras. 
>> After consensus is reached, the "not for 1.0 jiras" could be  moved to 
>> 1.1.
> 
> 
> Sure.  We could create a "not 1.0" bucket for the stuff we haven't  
> scheduled, for 1.0 or 1.1.  Jira has the following administration  
> options available for Versions: Edit Details, Merge, Release,  Archive, 
> and Delete.
> 
> -dain
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message