geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <>
Subject Re: Poll...1.0 for Apache Con - Feature request
Date Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:34:23 GMT
Trifork has been silent for a few weeks.  I think at this point the integration 
work would require several weeks but I'm probably not the best person to 
estimate the time.

Perhaps the Trifork folks can comment.   Anyone ?

Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 10/13/05, Matt Hogstrom <> wrote:
>>I sent an e-mail out about a week ago on what people thought about getting
>>Geronimo 1.0 out for Apache Con coming up in December.  I've heard back from a
>>few folks and the feedback has been generally positive.  There are a lot of
>>things we'd like to get done in terms of new feature / function and if we wait
>>until Geronimo is complete with all the cool stuff it will be a while before we
>>cut a 1.0 branch.
>>I think it would be sweet to finish this year out by saying we hit a 1.0 release
>>and Apache Con seems to be a good point to make the announcement.  So the
>>question is what do we need to get done to say 1.0 is ready?
>>So to kick off the discussion here we go ...
>>I included a brief calender below of the time we have between now and Apache Con
>>to try and figure out how much gas there was to get things done.  I figure we
>>have a little over 3 weeks to get our work done before we cut a branch and start
>>testing / verifying it.  I assumed that Thanksgiving week would be a bust for
>>most people so I took it out of the available time.  That leaves about three
>>weeks for CTS testing and resolving issues.  Thoughts on whether this makes any
>>sense or not?  I wrote my thoughts on what I figured was important for us in
>>terms of users accepting the server and using it.  Not sure how to get these
>>things done and I expect I'm missing a ton of things.
>>Let the adventure begin...
>>Feature list for 1.0
>>Console - focus on ensuring console is functional
>>Statement cache in TranQL - Improve JDBC performance
>>Installer for Geronimo (allow for selection of Web Container :)
>>Performance testing and fixes
>>Testing for stability
>>Usability (testing deploy of apps and customer experience)
>>DayTrader face lift and documentation
> What's the status of the interop/ORB stuff?
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
> The Castor Project
> Apache Geronimo

View raw message