geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <sppat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: rid of all ns prefixes]
Date Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:37:03 GMT


David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
>
>>
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd have the issue say that the eclipse stuff should pre-convert the 
>>> plans using SchemaConversionUtils.  We'll find out soon enough what 
>>> needs to change :-)  Is there an easy to find point in the eclipse 
>>> stuff where you know what kind of plan it is and want to convert it?
>> Well when importing a J2EE app or module into WTP a new 
>> "project/component" is always created for every module in that 
>> application and so I'll know every module type and thus should 
>> automatically know the j2ee plan type during the import.  This import 
>> operation is extendable and I'll be able to do this conversion then 
>> for every module.  (With nested plans, it may be a little tricker, 
>> will have to put some thought into that...)
>
> An ear plan always has namespaces for the plans for the modules.  They 
> could be the old unversioned namespaces (missing -1.0 at the end) but 
> they are sufficient to identify what you should end up with.  The web 
> plans are a little trickier, since after figuring out which builder we 
> will use the generic geronimo-web docs are converted to 
> container-specific docs.  Are you planning to generate generic web 
> plans or container specific web plans or give the user a choice?
For now probably just generic web plans, but eventually it would be nice 
to provide a choice to choose a container specific plan.
>
> An ear plan will still need some namespace conversion to get the 
> dependencies and gbeans.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>

Mime
View raw message