geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From anita kulshreshtha <a_kuls...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Generic Logo Contest Guidelines
Date Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:15:49 GMT


--- J <nemesis0101@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think one needs to understand the principle of
> design. To look at the
> issue subjectively and not emotionally. Once
> emotions are attached then is
> no longer a design and more a personal issue.
> 
> All I was trying to do here is to educate this
> community to look at the
> logo's subjectively and not with emotions.
> 
> My intentions are not to offend rather to educate.
> 
> I am sorry if educating is seen as offensive.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/9/05, Jeff Genender <jgenender@savoirtech.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > J wrote:
> > > Now whether I have or have not created a logo
> for this particular
> > > contest is irrevelant. I am just concerned about
> reading about this push
> > > if you all will for 2-3 logo's that quite
> honestly are not good and well
> > > just seem like they had no thought behind them.
> >
> > This seems awfully opinionated and is a bit
> condescending to the
> > community. Are you saying the community has rotten
> taste and doesn't
> > pick logos that have "thought" behind them? I
> personally find this
> > statement offensive.
> >
> > >
> > > A logo is a statement. A logo is an item with
> thought. And a handful of
> > > these logo's look more like an in the box
> concept that just steroetypes
> > > Native American's then actually helps the apache
> project out.
> >
> > What do you call the Apache feather then? I am
> sorry, but that feather
> > is obviously attached to a form of native american
> image. Do you feel
> > this way about the current Apache logo?
> >
> > >
> > > So the main question is this will there be a
> real vote with real time
> > > opporutnity to see results for all the logo's or
> just wait until #11
> > > gets picked because well it sucks, not well
> thought out and a good
> > > number of you like it for some unknown, ungodly
> reason?

        I see a lot of emotions here!

Thanks
Anita
> >
> > Is there a reason this type of verbage needs to be
> used? Can we engage
> > without showing disrespect? IMHO, I think we don't
> need to rate
> > people's taste factor. Again, I find this
> particularly offensive.
> >
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Music Unlimited 
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/

Mime
View raw message