Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77080 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2005 05:14:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2005 05:14:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 14374 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2005 05:14:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14328 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2005 05:14:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14315 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2005 05:14:19 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:14:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_BY_IP,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of brett.porter@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.204] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:14:29 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i27so73430wxd for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:14:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=q2D8onOVsZt2ucck7izhz1S4H9RaWNPepkXxoAt93jK2eMRMjLm2e3NNArdJdq7lHcE+WJxNCWtRSswtDtn8EVt93LVliKZzHtYAs2AAkC55L9nwHe2Brgt7UEaGQyQDAYKzPHFC0E0iIr1uv2ur0oochc8uM3D8eZ7sj7PKl0M= Received: by 10.70.16.19 with SMTP id 19mr17901wxp; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.40.5 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e3862d805091522147f4b17ce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:14:17 +1000 From: Brett Porter Reply-To: brett.porter@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: mirroring our downloads In-Reply-To: <9e3862d805091319561fc2ab64@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_37304_25022982.1126847657449" References: <151A770A-FB53-457C-BC50-51235576403B@apache.org> <715D903D-547D-4E30-A7EA-C605A9B3899B@visi.com> <9e3862d805090721231488c043@mail.gmail.com> <9e3862d805091319561fc2ab64@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_37304_25022982.1126847657449 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Done - originals are in archive.apache.org and= =20 ~brett/geronimo-poms and ~/geronimo-spec-poms (some of these had older=20 releases that were also invalid). Thanks! - Brett On 9/14/05, Brett Porter wrote: >=20 > On 9/8/05, Brett Porter wrote: > >=20 > > For the old releases, once they appear in archive.apache.org,=20 > > you can probably delete them from www.apache.org (this will mean they aren't mirrored, but available from the archive). > >=20 > > Can I ask that you delete the M2 and M3 POMs from java-repository? They= =20 > > aren't independantly valid or useful and Maven's repository management = has=20 > > started to squawk. Recent versions of the Maven artifact deployment plu= gin=20 > > will properly resolve the variables in them to make them useful for fut= ure=20 > > releases. > >=20 >=20 > Does anyone mind if I do this? Other than redeploying those releases usin= g=20 > a newer version of the artifact plugin that resolves the entities and par= ent=20 > poms, I don't see an easy way to get these corrected.=20 >=20 > Thanks, > Brett > ------=_Part_37304_25022982.1126847657449 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Done - originals are in archive.apach= e.org and ~brett/geronimo-poms and ~/geronimo-spec-poms (some of these = had older releases that were also invalid).

Thanks!

- Brett
On 9/14/05, Brett Porter <brett.po= rter@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/8/05, Brett Porter= <brett.porter@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
Does anyone mind if = I do this? Other than redeploying those releases using a newer version of t= he artifact plugin that resolves the entities and parent poms, I don't see = an easy way to get these corrected.

Thanks,
Brett

------=_Part_37304_25022982.1126847657449--