Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55578 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2005 16:52:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2005 16:52:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 98337 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2005 16:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 98295 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2005 16:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 98284 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2005 16:52:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:52:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jgenender@savoirtech.com designates 209.181.65.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.181.65.237] (HELO sun.savoirtech.com) (209.181.65.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:52:33 -0700 Received: from sun.savoirtech.com (sun.savoirtech.com [127.0.0.1]) by sun.savoirtech.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8UGopGV031351 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:50:51 -0600 Received: (from apache@localhost) by sun.savoirtech.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8UGopns031350; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:50:51 -0600 Received: from 12.17.202.43 (SquirrelMail authenticated user genj1) by mirage.savoirtech.com with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:50:51 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <52345.12.17.202.43.1128099051.squirrel@mirage.savoirtech.com> In-Reply-To: <433D5726.8030301@hogstrom.org> References: <433D3949.7060001@hogstrom.org> <433D5726.8030301@hogstrom.org> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:50:51 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: Logo Contest Update - The Final Days From: "Jeff Genender" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Reply-To: jgenender@savoirtech.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 [CVS]-0.cvs20050812.1.fc4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on sun.savoirtech.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.4 required=5.6 tests=BAYES_05,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N What is wrong with some of the others? Example, #11...I thought that the headress and its history was made clear by Noel, and thus was acceptable. Also I assume the headress is a native american symbol (a lot more feathers), not an image of a native american. Please correct me if I am wrong. (I know...I REALLY like #11 and want it to have a fair shake). ;-) Thanks, Jeff > Based on the criteria below I think the following images meet the > parameters: > > Entry # 2 URL: http://www.flyermoney.com/geronimo/ > Entry # 3 URL: http://elegoff.free.fr/geronimo/ > Entry # 4 URL: http://www.ashishgokhale.com/geronimo.htm > Entry # 9 URL: http://www.structuredview.com/geronimo/index.html > Entry # 12 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos1.jpg > Entry # 13 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos2.jpg > Entry # 14 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos3.jpg > Entry # 15 URL: http://www.dotech.com/geronimo/Apache_logos5.jpg > Entry # 16 URL: http://eischen.free.fr/gero/index.html > > > Links that need to be discussed: > These entries use a headdress (which is a bunch of feathers). > Entry # 7 URL: http://amethystpublishing.com/Apache%20Geronimo.htm > Entry # 10 URL: http://www.structuredview.com/armitage/index.html > Entry # 11 URL: http://www.media-style.com/geronimo/ > > My personal preference on these is that they should be allowable. I > prefer to judge based on merit. I think these are tastefully done. We > need a ruling of the PRC on these. > > > Links that are not compatible with the parameters established below: > Entry # 6 URL: http://rainhousemedia.com/geronimo/ > Entry # 16 URL: > http://www.epiqtech.com/corp/products/technology/opensource/geronimo.htm > > Links that no longer are functional and could not be verified: > Entry # 5 URL: http://www.morpheuschameleon.net/GeronimoLogo/ > Entry # 8 URL: http://ericlegoff.homelinux.org/geronimo.html > > - Matt > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> >> On Sep 30, 2005, at 9:10 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> The Logo contest has inspired many to get their creative juices >>> flowing and put some great effort into designing some excellent >>> artwork. Unfortunately, we can't use every one of the items that have >>> been donated so we'll have to pare them down to a single winner. >>> >>> As of this morning there are 17 Entries posted on the Wiki. They can >>> be found at http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/LogoContest . >>> >>> I propose the following time line to bring this to a timely >>> conclusion. >>> >>> Allow for last minute changes and additions to the logos so a vote >>> can be taken on a finite set of entries. This will be a one week >>> period ending at: 23:59 PDT on October 8th. >>> >>> A one week period for voting by members on the dev and user Geronimo >>> lists. A voting format will be posted to the list to make tabulating >>> the results easier. This will come out on Friday October 7th. >>> >>> Give one week for votes on the final sets of artwork from 00:01 >>> Saturday October 8th through 00:01 PDT Saturday October 15th. During >>> this time, discussion is welcome on the various entries on the dev >>> list. Please make sure we keep them in a single thread. >>> >>> As indicated on the Wiki, the PPMC is responsible for the final >>> selection but the voting and feedback from the community is critical >>> to making the best choice. >>> >> >> s/PPMC/PMC >> >> >> And I'd like to pre-filter based on the PRC guidelines. I've been >> discussing with them, and I've asked that they produce a final set of >> guidelines. However, the important one for us will be : >> >> "logo should not incorporate Native American images or >> existing cultural/religious symbolism. However, new symbols that >> merely evoke a native american theme (such as the feather) are fine." >> >> So I'd like to get rid of the ones that violate this guideline before >> we have the community vote. >> >> geir >> >